Managing nutrition-biodiversity trade-offs on coral reefs

Coral reefs support an incredible abundance and diversity of fish species, with reef-associated fisheries providing important sources of income, food, and dietary micronutrients to millions of people across the tropics. However, the rapid degradation of the world's coral reefs and the decline in their biodiversity may limit their capacity to supply nutritious and affordable seafood while meeting conservation goals for sustainability. Here, we conduct a global-scale analysis of how the nutritional quality of reef fish assemblages (nutritional contribution to the recommended daily intake of calcium, iron, and zinc contained in an average 100 g fish on the reef) relates to key environmental, socioeconomic, and ecological conditions, including two key metrics of fish biodiversity. Our global analysis of more than 1,600 tropical reefs reveals that fish trophic composition is a more important driver of micronutrient concentrations than socioeconomic and environmental conditions. Specifically, micronutrient density increases as the relative biomass of herbivores and detritivores increases at lower overall biomass or under high human pressure. This suggests that the provision of essential micronutrients can be maintained or even increase where fish biomass decreases, reinforcing the need for policies that ensure sustainable fishing, and that these micronutrients are retained locally for nutrition. Furthermore, we found a negative association between micronutrient density and two metrics of fish biodiversity, revealing an important nutrition-biodiversity trade-off. Protecting reefs with high levels of biodiversity maintains key ecosystem functions, whereas sustainable fisheries management in locations with high micronutrient density could sustain the essential supply of micronutrients to coastal human communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Biology
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.08.031
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing nutrition-biodiversity trade-offs on coral reefs

M. Aaron MacNeil, Christina C. Hicks, Nicholas A. J. Graham, James P. W. Robinson et al.
6 citations
Current Biology
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
2.75
article

Managing nutrition-biodiversity trade-offs on coral reefs

M. Aaron MacNeil, Christina C. Hicks, Nicholas A. J. Graham, James P. W. Robinson, Eva Maire, David Mouillot, Andrew S. Hoey, Suchinta Arif, Jessica Zamborain‐Mason, Sebastian C. A. Ferse, Matthew McLean, Joshua E. Cinner
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Coral reefs support an incredible abundance and diversity of fish species, with reef-associated fisheries providing important sources of income, food, and dietary micronutrients to millions of people across the tropics. However, the rapid degradation of the world's coral reefs and the decline in their biodiversity may limit their capacity to supply nutritious and affordable seafood while meeting conservation goals for sustainability. Here, we conduct a global-scale analysis of how the nutritional quality of reef fish assemblages (nutritional contribution to the recommended daily intake of calcium, iron, and zinc contained in an average 100 g fish on the reef) relates to key environmental, socioeconomic, and ecological conditions, including two key metrics of fish biodiversity. Our global analysis of more than 1,600 tropical reefs reveals that fish trophic composition is a more important driver of micronutrient concentrations than socioeconomic and environmental conditions. Specifically, micronutrient density increases as the relative biomass of herbivores and detritivores increases at lower overall biomass or under high human pressure. This suggests that the provision of essential micronutrients can be maintained or even increase where fish biomass decreases, reinforcing the need for policies that ensure sustainable fishing, and that these micronutrients are retained locally for nutrition. Furthermore, we found a negative association between micronutrient density and two metrics of fish biodiversity, revealing an important nutrition-biodiversity trade-off. Protecting reefs with high levels of biodiversity maintains key ecosystem functions, whereas sustainable fisheries management in locations with high micronutrient density could sustain the essential supply of micronutrients to coastal human communities.

Current BiologyVol. 34(20)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), The University of Sydney (AU), Dalhousie University (CA), Harvard University (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), Ifremer (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Lancaster University (GB), James Cook University (AU)
Leverhulme Trust, Royal Society, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, European Research Council, H2020 European Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
2.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.