Medical Equipment Aging: Part III—An Aging Model for Maintenance and Replacement Plannings

The first article of this series demonstrated that some medical equipment exhibits clear, progressive deterioration with age, whereas some others do not. The second article showed that although most equipment remains safely and reliably deployed well over its respective depreciation period and the end-of-life or end-of-support dates declared by the respective manufacturers, some equipment needs to be replaced sooner. Because it is not practical to wait for the collection and analysis of large amounts of data to better plan for maintenance and replacement, a simple, quantitative model for equipment aging is introduced in this article to help improve both types of planning. The model was tested on professionals not directly involved in its formulation and applied to 34 equipment types. The results show this aging model can be used by professionals experienced in medical equipment maintenance and management, with only some basic instructions. Furthermore, it can be used to update the traditional “risk-based criteria” for planned maintenance and turning it into a risk management method fully compliant with the ISO 14971 standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Engineering
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jce.0000000000000661
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Equipment Aging: Part III—An Aging Model for Maintenance and Replacement Plannings

Binseng Wang, Jason Gibson, Torgeir Rui, Scott Skinner et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Engineering
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
0.94
article

Medical Equipment Aging: Part III—An Aging Model for Maintenance and Replacement Plannings

Binseng Wang, Jason Gibson, Torgeir Rui, Scott Skinner, Morgan Ayers-Comegys, Steve Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The first article of this series demonstrated that some medical equipment exhibits clear, progressive deterioration with age, whereas some others do not. The second article showed that although most equipment remains safely and reliably deployed well over its respective depreciation period and the end-of-life or end-of-support dates declared by the respective manufacturers, some equipment needs to be replaced sooner. Because it is not practical to wait for the collection and analysis of large amounts of data to better plan for maintenance and replacement, a simple, quantitative model for equipment aging is introduced in this article to help improve both types of planning. The model was tested on professionals not directly involved in its formulation and applied to 34 equipment types. The results show this aging model can be used by professionals experienced in medical equipment maintenance and management, with only some basic instructions. Furthermore, it can be used to update the traditional “risk-based criteria” for planned maintenance and turning it into a risk management method fully compliant with the ISO 14971 standard.

Journal of Clinical EngineeringVol. 49(4)
Joint Replacement Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Medical Equipment Aging: Part III—An Aging Model for Maintenance and Replacement Plannings — Binseng Wang, Jason Gibson, et al. · Journal of Clinical Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS