The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs

Scholarship on past major crises, such as wars and depressions, argues that these events transformed mass attitudes about the role of the state. Motivated by these claims, we theorize reasons why the COVID-19 pandemic might have shifted citizens’ ideological beliefs and investigate whether it has. Using original panel data from the United Kingdom, we find no evidence that the pandemic affected beliefs about the role of government, even for those directly experiencing economic losses or new forms of state relief. In a follow-up survey experiment, we also find that voters do not change their opinions on redistribution or the role of government even when exposed to elite cues that frame the crisis as revealing the need for state expansion. Our findings suggest that crises may more commonly exert their effects on mass beliefs via the long-term feedback effects of elite-driven policy changes than through direct exposure to crisis conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732993
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs

Timothy Jacobs Hicks, J. Scott Matthews, Jack Blumenau, Tom O’Grady et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Politics
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
2.23
article

The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs

Timothy Jacobs Hicks, J. Scott Matthews, Jack Blumenau, Tom O’Grady, Alan M. Jacobs
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scholarship on past major crises, such as wars and depressions, argues that these events transformed mass attitudes about the role of the state. Motivated by these claims, we theorize reasons why the COVID-19 pandemic might have shifted citizens’ ideological beliefs and investigate whether it has. Using original panel data from the United Kingdom, we find no evidence that the pandemic affected beliefs about the role of government, even for those directly experiencing economic losses or new forms of state relief. In a follow-up survey experiment, we also find that voters do not change their opinions on redistribution or the role of government even when exposed to elite cues that frame the crisis as revealing the need for state expansion. Our findings suggest that crises may more commonly exert their effects on mass beliefs via the long-term feedback effects of elite-driven policy changes than through direct exposure to crisis conditions.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(3)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs — Timothy Jacobs Hicks, J. Scott Matthews, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS