Misinformation, Narratives, and Intergroup Attitudes: Evidence from India

Much research examines citizens’ beliefs in misinformation and whether these beliefs can be corrected, but we know far less about how misinformation impacts social attitudes. We propose that misinformation can induce affective shifts that increase out-group animosity and fuel polarization. Politicians amplify these effects by embedding misinformation into larger narratives of threat from out-groups. We conduct a preregistered vignette experiment following the 2021 elections in West Bengal, India, exposing respondents to a misinformation message that invokes salient identity cleavages. We randomize whether citizens are asked about intergroup attitudes before or after exposure to misinformation and find that treated respondents report more hostile out-group attitudes. Corrective information fails to mitigate these negative effects, suggesting that the effects of misinformation may not operate through citizens’ factual beliefs. While it is known that directional motives aid the proliferation of misinformation on social media, our study shows that misinformation itself can exacerbate social cleavages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732979
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misinformation, Narratives, and Intergroup Attitudes: Evidence from India

Ursula Daxecker, Hanne Fjelde, Neeraj Prasad
2 citations
The Journal of Politics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
article

Misinformation, Narratives, and Intergroup Attitudes: Evidence from India

Ursula Daxecker, Hanne Fjelde, Neeraj Prasad
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Much research examines citizens’ beliefs in misinformation and whether these beliefs can be corrected, but we know far less about how misinformation impacts social attitudes. We propose that misinformation can induce affective shifts that increase out-group animosity and fuel polarization. Politicians amplify these effects by embedding misinformation into larger narratives of threat from out-groups. We conduct a preregistered vignette experiment following the 2021 elections in West Bengal, India, exposing respondents to a misinformation message that invokes salient identity cleavages. We randomize whether citizens are asked about intergroup attitudes before or after exposure to misinformation and find that treated respondents report more hostile out-group attitudes. Corrective information fails to mitigate these negative effects, suggesting that the effects of misinformation may not operate through citizens’ factual beliefs. While it is known that directional motives aid the proliferation of misinformation on social media, our study shows that misinformation itself can exacerbate social cleavages.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(2)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misinformation, Narratives, and Intergroup Attitudes: Evidence from India — Ursula Daxecker, Hanne Fjelde, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS