Investigating building permit processes across Europe: characteristics and patterns

Building permit processes serve as crucial gatekeepers for urban development, regulating compliance with building codes, land use policies, and safety and environmental standards. However, their complexity can lead to inefficiencies and hinder economic growth. While existing studies have made significant contributions to building permit process research, they often focus on individual countries or specific aspects, leaving a gap in comprehensive comparative analysis. Characteristics, and patterns of building permit processes vary widely across jurisdictions due to legal, cultural, technological, and institutional factors which makes a comparative analysis of these variations beneficial. To address the lack of building permit process studies, our research focusses on from an extensive comparative study of building permit processes in 17 European countries. Through semi-structured interviews and process diagrams, we investigate the differences and provide a comparative overview summarizing key characteristics. The findings have the potential to be used by policy makers and practice to better understand and compare the evolution of building permit systems in a broad international context. By bridging research gaps and providing a comprehensive view of these processes, we contribute to the awareness of the diversity of the processes and to fostering greater understanding of building permit processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Research & Information
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2400467
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating building permit processes across Europe: characteristics and patterns

Jernej Tekavec, Per‐Ola Olsson, Christopher-Robin Raitviir, Snežana Rutešić et al.
11 citations
Building Research & Information
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.08
article

Investigating building permit processes across Europe: characteristics and patterns

Jernej Tekavec, Per‐Ola Olsson, Christopher-Robin Raitviir, Snežana Rutešić, Christian Schranz, José Granja, Peter Nørkjær Gade, Nicholas Nisbet, Judith Fauth, Harald Urban, Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura, Ruben Verstraeten, Kavita Raj, Trajche Stojanov, Jonas Goul Pedersen, Antero Hirvensalo, Anna-Riitta Kallinen, Stefanie Brigitte Deac Kaiser
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Building permit processes serve as crucial gatekeepers for urban development, regulating compliance with building codes, land use policies, and safety and environmental standards. However, their complexity can lead to inefficiencies and hinder economic growth. While existing studies have made significant contributions to building permit process research, they often focus on individual countries or specific aspects, leaving a gap in comprehensive comparative analysis. Characteristics, and patterns of building permit processes vary widely across jurisdictions due to legal, cultural, technological, and institutional factors which makes a comparative analysis of these variations beneficial. To address the lack of building permit process studies, our research focusses on from an extensive comparative study of building permit processes in 17 European countries. Through semi-structured interviews and process diagrams, we investigate the differences and provide a comparative overview summarizing key characteristics. The findings have the potential to be used by policy makers and practice to better understand and compare the evolution of building permit systems in a broad international context. By bridging research gaps and providing a comprehensive view of these processes, we contribute to the awareness of the diversity of the processes and to fostering greater understanding of building permit processes.

Building Research & InformationVol. 53(4)
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), TU Wien (AT), University of Ljubljana (SI), Tampere University (FI), Lund University (SE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Brescia University (US), Polytechnic University of Timişoara (RO), University College of Northern Denmark (DK), Ghent University (BE), Ministry of Education and Science (MK), The Ark (IE), University College London (GB), University of Montenegro (ME), Meisei University (JP), University of Brescia (IT), Semnan University (IR), University of Minho (PT)
European Commission, Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Technische Universität Wien, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Technische Universität Wien Bibliothek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.