Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data

Air sensors can provide valuable non-regulatory and supplemental data as they can be affordably deployed in large numbers and stationed in remote areas far away from regulatory air monitoring stations. Air sensors have inherent limitations that are critical to understand before collecting and interpreting the data. Many of these limitations are mechanistic in nature, which will require technological advances. However, there are documented quality assurance (QA) methods to promote data quality. These include laboratory and field evaluation to quantitatively assess performance, the application of corrections to improve precision and accuracy, and active management of the condition or state of health of deployed air quality sensors. This paper summarizes perspectives presented at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Air Sensors Quality Assurance Workshop (https://www.epa.gov/air-sensor-toolbox/quality-assurance-air-sensors#QAworkshop) by stakeholders (e.g., manufacturers, researchers, air agencies) and identifies the most pressing needs. These include QA protocols, streamlined data processing, improved total volatile organic compound (TVOC) data interpretation, development of speciated VOC sensors, and increased documentation of hardware and data handling. Community members using air sensors need training and resources, timely data, accessible QA approaches, and shared responsibility with other stakeholders. In addition to identifying the vital next steps, this work provides a set of common QA and QC actions aimed at improving and homogenizing air sensor QA that will allow stakeholders with varying fields and levels of expertise to effectively leverage air sensor data to protect human health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00125
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data

Wilton Mui, Jan-Michael Archer, Timothy Dye, Karoline K. Barkjohn et al.
20 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
4.11
article

Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data

Wilton Mui, Jan-Michael Archer, Timothy Dye, Karoline K. Barkjohn, Andrea L. Clements, Michael Bergin, Eben D. Thoma, Amara L. Holder, Megan MacDonald, Naomi Zimmerman, Michael Ogletree, Elizabeth Good, Berkley G. Hillis, Matthew S. Landis, Brandon Feenstra, Ashley Bittner, Wyatt M. Champion, B. Gantt, Christi Chester-Schroeder, Corey Mocka, Colin Barrette, M. Dinesh Kumar
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Air sensors can provide valuable non-regulatory and supplemental data as they can be affordably deployed in large numbers and stationed in remote areas far away from regulatory air monitoring stations. Air sensors have inherent limitations that are critical to understand before collecting and interpreting the data. Many of these limitations are mechanistic in nature, which will require technological advances. However, there are documented quality assurance (QA) methods to promote data quality. These include laboratory and field evaluation to quantitatively assess performance, the application of corrections to improve precision and accuracy, and active management of the condition or state of health of deployed air quality sensors. This paper summarizes perspectives presented at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Air Sensors Quality Assurance Workshop (https://www.epa.gov/air-sensor-toolbox/quality-assurance-air-sensors#QAworkshop) by stakeholders (e.g., manufacturers, researchers, air agencies) and identifies the most pressing needs. These include QA protocols, streamlined data processing, improved total volatile organic compound (TVOC) data interpretation, development of speciated VOC sensors, and increased documentation of hardware and data handling. Community members using air sensors need training and resources, timely data, accessible QA approaches, and shared responsibility with other stakeholders. In addition to identifying the vital next steps, this work provides a set of common QA and QC actions aimed at improving and homogenizing air sensor QA that will allow stakeholders with varying fields and levels of expertise to effectively leverage air sensor data to protect human health.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 1(10)
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (US), Environmental Protection Agency (US), Research Triangle Park Foundation (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Duke University (US), Denver Federal Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
4.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.