Servitization as a strategy for diffusing radical technologies: An analysis of U.S. top corporate R&D investors

The diffusion of radical technologies poses a significant challenge for firms. While existing studies have mainly concentrated on organizing for radical innovation, less attention has been given to strategies that enable firms to bring these technologies to the product market. In this paper, we argue that servitization – the addition of product-related services to tangible product offerings – can serve as a potential solution, largely due to its ability to reduce customer uncertainty about the nature and utilization of radical technologies and offset adoption costs. However, there are limits to deploying this strategy: developing and implementing service-generating capabilities, together with maintaining and advancing the capability to generate radical technologies, can be costly and risky. Our analysis of 505 top corporate R&D investors from the U.S. manufacturing industry confirms a significant relationship between technological radicalness and servitization, but it is nuanced and depends on the level of financial resources available to firms, known as financial resource slack. More specifically, firms with higher slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies are more radical. In turn, firms with lower slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies fall within the middle range of the radicalness spectrum. We use these findings to draw implications for practice and policy. • Firms often struggle with commercializing radical technologies because it requires cutting across existing organizational structures and processes. • Along with intra-organizational barriers, firms should also address customer uncertainty regarding radical technologies, which hinders customer adoption. • One way to address this uncertainty is by deploying a servitization strategy, which involves blending product offerings with product-related services. • However, the use of this strategy needs to be coordinated with both the radicalness of a firm's technological portfolio and the availability of resources, including financial resources. • Empirical evidence suggests that firms with higher financial resource slack servitize more when their technologies are more radical, while firms with lower financial resource slack servitize more when their technologies fall within the middle range of the radicalness spectrum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105123
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Servitization as a strategy for diffusing radical technologies: An analysis of U.S. top corporate R&D investors

Carolina Castaldi, Shukhrat Nasirov
9 citations
Research Policy
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
6.58
article

Servitization as a strategy for diffusing radical technologies: An analysis of U.S. top corporate R&D investors

Carolina Castaldi, Shukhrat Nasirov
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The diffusion of radical technologies poses a significant challenge for firms. While existing studies have mainly concentrated on organizing for radical innovation, less attention has been given to strategies that enable firms to bring these technologies to the product market. In this paper, we argue that servitization – the addition of product-related services to tangible product offerings – can serve as a potential solution, largely due to its ability to reduce customer uncertainty about the nature and utilization of radical technologies and offset adoption costs. However, there are limits to deploying this strategy: developing and implementing service-generating capabilities, together with maintaining and advancing the capability to generate radical technologies, can be costly and risky. Our analysis of 505 top corporate R&D investors from the U.S. manufacturing industry confirms a significant relationship between technological radicalness and servitization, but it is nuanced and depends on the level of financial resources available to firms, known as financial resource slack. More specifically, firms with higher slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies are more radical. In turn, firms with lower slack have a greater extent of servitization activities when their technologies fall within the middle range of the radicalness spectrum. We use these findings to draw implications for practice and policy. • Firms often struggle with commercializing radical technologies because it requires cutting across existing organizational structures and processes. • Along with intra-organizational barriers, firms should also address customer uncertainty regarding radical technologies, which hinders customer adoption. • One way to address this uncertainty is by deploying a servitization strategy, which involves blending product offerings with product-related services. • However, the use of this strategy needs to be coordinated with both the radicalness of a firm's technological portfolio and the availability of resources, including financial resources. • Empirical evidence suggests that firms with higher financial resource slack servitize more when their technologies are more radical, while firms with lower financial resource slack servitize more when their technologies fall within the middle range of the radicalness spectrum.

Research PolicyVol. 54(1)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
6.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.