Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks

There is limited understanding of the information captured by deep spatiotemporal models in their intermediate representations. For example, while evidence suggests that action recognition algorithms are heavily influenced by visual appearance in single frames, no quantitative methodology exists for evaluating such static bias in the latent representation compared to bias toward dynamics. We tackle this challenge by proposing an approach for quantifying the static and dynamic biases of any spatiotemporal model, and apply our approach to three tasks, action recognition, automatic video object segmentation (AVOS) and video instance segmentation (VIS). Our key findings are: (i) Most examined models are biased toward static information. (ii) Some datasets that are assumed to be biased toward dynamics are actually biased toward static information. (iii) Individual channels in an architecture can be biased toward static, dynamic or jointly encode a combination static and dynamic information. (iv) Most models converge to their culminating biases in the first half of training. We then explore how these biases affect performance on dynamically biased datasets. For action recognition, we propose StaticDropout, a semantically guided dropout that debiases a model from static information toward dynamics. For AVOS, we design a better combination of fusion and cross connection layers compared with previous architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2024.3462291
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks

Mennatullah Siam, Matthew D. Kowal, Neil D. B. Bruce, Richard P. Wildes et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Data Visualization and Analytics
0.25
article

Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks

Mennatullah Siam, Matthew D. Kowal, Neil D. B. Bruce, Richard P. Wildes, Md Amirul Islam, Konstantinos G. Derpanis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is limited understanding of the information captured by deep spatiotemporal models in their intermediate representations. For example, while evidence suggests that action recognition algorithms are heavily influenced by visual appearance in single frames, no quantitative methodology exists for evaluating such static bias in the latent representation compared to bias toward dynamics. We tackle this challenge by proposing an approach for quantifying the static and dynamic biases of any spatiotemporal model, and apply our approach to three tasks, action recognition, automatic video object segmentation (AVOS) and video instance segmentation (VIS). Our key findings are: (i) Most examined models are biased toward static information. (ii) Some datasets that are assumed to be biased toward dynamics are actually biased toward static information. (iii) Individual channels in an architecture can be biased toward static, dynamic or jointly encode a combination static and dynamic information. (iv) Most models converge to their culminating biases in the first half of training. We then explore how these biases affect performance on dynamically biased datasets. For action recognition, we propose StaticDropout, a semantically guided dropout that debiases a model from static information toward dynamics. For AVOS, we design a better combination of fusion and cross connection layers compared with previous architectures.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceVol. 47(1)
York University (CA), Ontario Tech University (CA), Huawei Technologies (Canada) (CA), Huawei Technologies (Sweden) (SE), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Data Visualization and Analytics
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.