Constructing a Large Language Model to Generate Impressions from Findings in Radiology Reports

Background The specialization and complexity of radiology makes the automatic generation of radiologic impressions (ie, a diagnosis with differential diagnosis and management recommendations) challenging. Purpose To develop a large language model (LLM) that generates impressions based on imaging findings and to evaluate its performance in professional and linguistic dimensions. Materials and Methods Six radiologists recorded imaging examination findings from August 2 to 31, 2023, at Shanghai General Hospital and used the developed LLM before routinely writing report impressions for multiple radiologic modalities (CT, MRI, radiography, mammography) and anatomic sites (cranium and face, neck, chest, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, vessels, bone and joint, spine, breast), making necessary corrections and completing the radiologic impression. A subset was defined to investigate cases where the LLM-generated impressions differed from the final radiologist impressions by excluding identical and highly similar cases. An expert panel scored the LLM-generated impressions on a five-point Likert scale (5 = strongly agree) based on scientific terminology, coherence, specific diagnosis, differential diagnosis, management recommendations, correctness, comprehensiveness, harmlessness, and lack of bias. Results In this retrospective study, an LLM was pretrained using 20 GB of medical and general-purpose text data. The fine-tuning data set comprised 1.5 GB of data, including 800 radiology reports with paired instructions (describing the output task in natural language) and outputs. Test set 2 included data from 3988 patients (median age, 56 years [IQR, 40-68 years]; 2159 male). The median recall, precision, and F1 score of LLM-generated impressions were 0.775 (IQR, 0.56-1), 0.84 (IQR, 0.611-1), and 0.772 (IQR, 0.578-0.957), respectively, using the final impressions as the reference standard. In a subset of 1014 patients (median age, 57 years [IQR, 42-69 years]; 528 male), the overall median expert panel score for LLM-generated impressions was 5 (IQR, 5-5), ranging from 4 (IQR, 3-5) to 5 (IQR, 5-5). Conclusion The developed LLM generated radiologic impressions that were professionally and linguistically appropriate for a full spectrum of radiology examinations. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240885
Citations
54
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing a Large Language Model to Generate Impressions from Findings in Radiology Reports

Xueqian Xie, Jue Zhao, Xiangjun Xu, Gehong Yao et al.
54 citations
Radiology
Radiology practices and education
21.83
article

Constructing a Large Language Model to Generate Impressions from Findings in Radiology Reports

Xueqian Xie, Jue Zhao, Xiangjun Xu, Gehong Yao, Y Zhang, Mingqian Liu, Lu Zhang, Lingyun Wang, Xu Chen, Yan Feng, Lin Zhang, Zhijun Pan
article en
54 citations

Abstract

Background The specialization and complexity of radiology makes the automatic generation of radiologic impressions (ie, a diagnosis with differential diagnosis and management recommendations) challenging. Purpose To develop a large language model (LLM) that generates impressions based on imaging findings and to evaluate its performance in professional and linguistic dimensions. Materials and Methods Six radiologists recorded imaging examination findings from August 2 to 31, 2023, at Shanghai General Hospital and used the developed LLM before routinely writing report impressions for multiple radiologic modalities (CT, MRI, radiography, mammography) and anatomic sites (cranium and face, neck, chest, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, vessels, bone and joint, spine, breast), making necessary corrections and completing the radiologic impression. A subset was defined to investigate cases where the LLM-generated impressions differed from the final radiologist impressions by excluding identical and highly similar cases. An expert panel scored the LLM-generated impressions on a five-point Likert scale (5 = strongly agree) based on scientific terminology, coherence, specific diagnosis, differential diagnosis, management recommendations, correctness, comprehensiveness, harmlessness, and lack of bias. Results In this retrospective study, an LLM was pretrained using 20 GB of medical and general-purpose text data. The fine-tuning data set comprised 1.5 GB of data, including 800 radiology reports with paired instructions (describing the output task in natural language) and outputs. Test set 2 included data from 3988 patients (median age, 56 years [IQR, 40-68 years]; 2159 male). The median recall, precision, and F1 score of LLM-generated impressions were 0.775 (IQR, 0.56-1), 0.84 (IQR, 0.611-1), and 0.772 (IQR, 0.578-0.957), respectively, using the final impressions as the reference standard. In a subset of 1014 patients (median age, 57 years [IQR, 42-69 years]; 528 male), the overall median expert panel score for LLM-generated impressions was 5 (IQR, 5-5), ranging from 4 (IQR, 3-5) to 5 (IQR, 5-5). Conclusion The developed LLM generated radiologic impressions that were professionally and linguistically appropriate for a full spectrum of radiology examinations. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

RadiologyVol. 312(3)
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (CN)
Shanghai General Hospital
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Radiology practices and education
21.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.