Sex Difference In Post-workout Hemodynamics With Varying Order Of Upper- And Lower-body Resistance Exercise

Different orders of upper- and lower-body resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to induce different hemodynamic responses. However, combinations of upper- and lower-body RE with different orders on hemodynamics between sexes are unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the sex differences between different orders of upper-and lower-body RE on hemodynamics. METHODS: Eleven men and ten women (23 ± 3 vs. 22 ± 2 years old) completed the study. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were measured at rest, 15-20 (R1), and 25-30 (R2) minutes after either upper- and lower-body RE (UL) or lower- and upper-body RE (LU) workous, which included 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 75% 1-repetition maximum with 90-second and 2-minute rests between sets and exercises. The upper-body RE consisted of latissimus dorsi pulldown and incline chest press while lower-body RE consisted of knee extension and knee flexion. A three-way mixed ANOVA was used to determine the effect of the sex across conditions and time on hemodynamics. RESULTS: HR and CO were significantly (p < 0.05) increased at R1 and R2 after UL and LU compared to rest in both sexes while LU induced higher HR in men compared women at R1 and R2 (Men: UL: rest: 59 ± 8; R1: 92 ± 13; R2: 83 ± 13; LU: rest: 60 ± 8; R1: 94 ± 11; R2: 89 ± 13; Women: UL: rest: 63 ± 7; R1: 81 ± 12; R2: 76 ± 9; LU: rest: 64 ± 9; R1: 79 ± 12; R2: 73 ± 11 bpm). SV was significantly lower after LU at R1 and R2 in men compared to rest, UL, and women (Men: UL: rest: 90 ± 20; R1: 95 ± 13; R2: 92 ± 17; LU: rest: 92 ± 14; R1: 85 ± 12; R2: 83 ± 16; Women: UL: rest: 105 ± 14; R1: 96 ± 8; R2: 96 ± 12; LU: rest: 107 ± 17; R1: 99 ± 13; R2: 101 ± 17 ml/beat). TPR was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in women compared to men at rest and significantly reduced at R1 and R2 compared to rest after UL and LU in both men and women (Men: UL: rest: 1.14 ± 0.34; R1: 0.66 ± 0.23; R2: 0.78 ± 0.26; LU: rest: 1.14 ± 0.34; R1: 0.76 ± 0.20; R2: 0.82 ± 0.26; Women: UL: rest: 0.80 ± 0.27; R1: 0.63 ± 0.18; R2: 0.73 ± 0.18; LU: rest: 0.83 ± 0.18; R1: 0.69 ± 0.23; R2: 0.76 ± 0.22 mmHg•min/L). However, there was no change for MAP. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that LU significantly increases HR and decreases SV in men compared to women, leading to similar the CO between sexes. Men have significantly higher resting TPR due to significantly higher resting CO compared to women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001058888.97224.3f
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Difference In Post-workout Hemodynamics With Varying Order Of Upper- And Lower-body Resistance Exercise

Yu Lun Tai, Omar Garcia, Ryan Russell, Andrea Toledo et al.
1 links
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Sex Difference In Post-workout Hemodynamics With Varying Order Of Upper- And Lower-body Resistance Exercise

Yu Lun Tai, Omar Garcia, Ryan Russell, Andrea Toledo, Alissa Olvera
article en

Abstract

Different orders of upper- and lower-body resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to induce different hemodynamic responses. However, combinations of upper- and lower-body RE with different orders on hemodynamics between sexes are unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the sex differences between different orders of upper-and lower-body RE on hemodynamics. METHODS: Eleven men and ten women (23 ± 3 vs. 22 ± 2 years old) completed the study. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were measured at rest, 15-20 (R1), and 25-30 (R2) minutes after either upper- and lower-body RE (UL) or lower- and upper-body RE (LU) workous, which included 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 75% 1-repetition maximum with 90-second and 2-minute rests between sets and exercises. The upper-body RE consisted of latissimus dorsi pulldown and incline chest press while lower-body RE consisted of knee extension and knee flexion. A three-way mixed ANOVA was used to determine the effect of the sex across conditions and time on hemodynamics. RESULTS: HR and CO were significantly (p < 0.05) increased at R1 and R2 after UL and LU compared to rest in both sexes while LU induced higher HR in men compared women at R1 and R2 (Men: UL: rest: 59 ± 8; R1: 92 ± 13; R2: 83 ± 13; LU: rest: 60 ± 8; R1: 94 ± 11; R2: 89 ± 13; Women: UL: rest: 63 ± 7; R1: 81 ± 12; R2: 76 ± 9; LU: rest: 64 ± 9; R1: 79 ± 12; R2: 73 ± 11 bpm). SV was significantly lower after LU at R1 and R2 in men compared to rest, UL, and women (Men: UL: rest: 90 ± 20; R1: 95 ± 13; R2: 92 ± 17; LU: rest: 92 ± 14; R1: 85 ± 12; R2: 83 ± 16; Women: UL: rest: 105 ± 14; R1: 96 ± 8; R2: 96 ± 12; LU: rest: 107 ± 17; R1: 99 ± 13; R2: 101 ± 17 ml/beat). TPR was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in women compared to men at rest and significantly reduced at R1 and R2 compared to rest after UL and LU in both men and women (Men: UL: rest: 1.14 ± 0.34; R1: 0.66 ± 0.23; R2: 0.78 ± 0.26; LU: rest: 1.14 ± 0.34; R1: 0.76 ± 0.20; R2: 0.82 ± 0.26; Women: UL: rest: 0.80 ± 0.27; R1: 0.63 ± 0.18; R2: 0.73 ± 0.18; LU: rest: 0.83 ± 0.18; R1: 0.69 ± 0.23; R2: 0.76 ± 0.22 mmHg•min/L). However, there was no change for MAP. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that LU significantly increases HR and decreases SV in men compared to women, leading to similar the CO between sexes. Men have significantly higher resting TPR due to significantly higher resting CO compared to women.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.