Limb Loading Asymmetry During Simulated Daily Functional Tasks

The threshold of 10% symmetry has been proposed as an expected level of limb difference in healthy populations. While this threshold has been used to evaluate both clinical and athletic populations, questions remain about the expected level of symmetry in healthy populations. PURPOSE: To determine differences in load symmetry in healthy young adults during 4 activities of daily living: level walking (LW), sit to stand (STS), stair ascent (SA) and stair descent (SD). We hypothesized the peak impact force symmetry would not exceed 10% for any functional task. METHODS: 72 healthy young adults were enrolled in this IRB approved study. A load sensing insole was fit into athletic shoes for each participant. Plantar loading data was collected at 200 Hz while participants completed 7 trials for each of the 4 tasks. Peak impact force (PIF) was found bilaterally for each trial using MATLAB and were used to calculate limb symmetry (ASI, LSI, NSI). A χ^2 analysis was conducted using RStudio (R, ver 4.3.1, Boston, MA, USA) to determine the appropriateness of the 10% threshold for each task. RESULTS: As Figure 1 shows, results indicate the mean and median PIF symmetry values for each task were all below the 10% threshold. The STS task had the highest asymmetry (mean LSI = 8.55%), while LW had the lowest asymmetry (mean LSI = 4.58%). The PIF symmetry values for LW, SA, and SD were all found to have a χ^2 value below the critical threshold (χ^2 = 3.84,α = 0.05), however, the χ^2 values for the STS task were above the critical threshold (χ^2 = 110.0,110.0,121.7 for the ASI, LSI, and NSI, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 10% threshold was found to be appropriate to describe the level of expected symmetry in healthy young adults during LW, SA, and SD, however, the 10% threshold was not suitable for the STS task. Future work is needed to identify an appropriate threshold for the STS task and determine the suitability of these thresholds for different populations, varying tasks, and other kinetic and kinematic measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053164.14026.34
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limb Loading Asymmetry During Simulated Daily Functional Tasks

Robin M. Queen, Garret Burks, Jill Streamer, Tyler Schalow
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Limb Loading Asymmetry During Simulated Daily Functional Tasks

Robin M. Queen, Garret Burks, Jill Streamer, Tyler Schalow
article en

Abstract

The threshold of 10% symmetry has been proposed as an expected level of limb difference in healthy populations. While this threshold has been used to evaluate both clinical and athletic populations, questions remain about the expected level of symmetry in healthy populations. PURPOSE: To determine differences in load symmetry in healthy young adults during 4 activities of daily living: level walking (LW), sit to stand (STS), stair ascent (SA) and stair descent (SD). We hypothesized the peak impact force symmetry would not exceed 10% for any functional task. METHODS: 72 healthy young adults were enrolled in this IRB approved study. A load sensing insole was fit into athletic shoes for each participant. Plantar loading data was collected at 200 Hz while participants completed 7 trials for each of the 4 tasks. Peak impact force (PIF) was found bilaterally for each trial using MATLAB and were used to calculate limb symmetry (ASI, LSI, NSI). A χ^2 analysis was conducted using RStudio (R, ver 4.3.1, Boston, MA, USA) to determine the appropriateness of the 10% threshold for each task. RESULTS: As Figure 1 shows, results indicate the mean and median PIF symmetry values for each task were all below the 10% threshold. The STS task had the highest asymmetry (mean LSI = 8.55%), while LW had the lowest asymmetry (mean LSI = 4.58%). The PIF symmetry values for LW, SA, and SD were all found to have a χ^2 value below the critical threshold (χ^2 = 3.84,α = 0.05), however, the χ^2 values for the STS task were above the critical threshold (χ^2 = 110.0,110.0,121.7 for the ASI, LSI, and NSI, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 10% threshold was found to be appropriate to describe the level of expected symmetry in healthy young adults during LW, SA, and SD, however, the 10% threshold was not suitable for the STS task. Future work is needed to identify an appropriate threshold for the STS task and determine the suitability of these thresholds for different populations, varying tasks, and other kinetic and kinematic measures.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Limb Loading Asymmetry During Simulated Daily Functional Tasks — Robin M. Queen, Garret Burks, et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS