The Comparison Of Hydration Practices Between Full- And Half-marathoners At The Hyannis Marathon Event

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the self-reported hydration practices in both full- and half-marathon runners comparing 2020 to 2022 from same event. Inconsistent hydration practices may lead to overhydration, a primary cause of exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH). Drinking according to thirst (DTT) is recommended to prevent EAH in lieu of a personalized hydration plan. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey design. An online survey utilized the Hyannis Marathon registrants during 2020 (full-marathoners, n = 49) and repeated among 2022 (half-marathoners, n = 42). Survey questions addressed hydration practices during an intended long training run (LTR), an intended event, and the actual race. Participants completed a pre- and post-race survey. RESULTS: When comparing actual volumes consumed by the full-marathoners to volumes intended, there was a significant correlation of 0.49 (p = 0.0008, n = 29), vs. a correlation of 0.13 (p = 0.52, n = 25) for the same comparison in half-marathoners. Hydration practices selected included DTT 17% of the time, while half marathoners selected DTT 21% of the time. None of the marathoners and 5% of the half marathoners reported having a personalized hydration plan. The reported hydration information sources (2020) were similar to the half marathoners (2022), including running friends (22% vs. 19%), other Internet sources (22% vs. 19%), and running magazines or books (18% vs. 22%). The comparison of hydration strategies between an intended LTR and an intended event was 69% (2020) and 63% (2022) agreement. When comparing the hydration strategy between an intended event and the actual event, the agreement was 52% (2020) vs. 62% (2022). When comparing the hydration strategy of the intended LTR to the actual event, the agreement was 65% (2020) vs. 53% (2022). CONCLUSION: In this study, both half- and full-marathon runners reported some differences in hydration practices when comparing a LTR, an intended event, and an actual event. If runners mimic appropriate hydration practices during training when running an event, the risk of EAH may be decreased. Improvements in hydration practices of runners from 2020 to 2022 included hydration strategy selection and consistency among scenarios. The primary limitations of this study were the self-reported nature of this data and the small sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001058144.98719.e9
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Comparison Of Hydration Practices Between Full- And Half-marathoners At The Hyannis Marathon Event

Suzanne L. Young
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

The Comparison Of Hydration Practices Between Full- And Half-marathoners At The Hyannis Marathon Event

Suzanne L. Young
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the self-reported hydration practices in both full- and half-marathon runners comparing 2020 to 2022 from same event. Inconsistent hydration practices may lead to overhydration, a primary cause of exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH). Drinking according to thirst (DTT) is recommended to prevent EAH in lieu of a personalized hydration plan. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey design. An online survey utilized the Hyannis Marathon registrants during 2020 (full-marathoners, n = 49) and repeated among 2022 (half-marathoners, n = 42). Survey questions addressed hydration practices during an intended long training run (LTR), an intended event, and the actual race. Participants completed a pre- and post-race survey. RESULTS: When comparing actual volumes consumed by the full-marathoners to volumes intended, there was a significant correlation of 0.49 (p = 0.0008, n = 29), vs. a correlation of 0.13 (p = 0.52, n = 25) for the same comparison in half-marathoners. Hydration practices selected included DTT 17% of the time, while half marathoners selected DTT 21% of the time. None of the marathoners and 5% of the half marathoners reported having a personalized hydration plan. The reported hydration information sources (2020) were similar to the half marathoners (2022), including running friends (22% vs. 19%), other Internet sources (22% vs. 19%), and running magazines or books (18% vs. 22%). The comparison of hydration strategies between an intended LTR and an intended event was 69% (2020) and 63% (2022) agreement. When comparing the hydration strategy between an intended event and the actual event, the agreement was 52% (2020) vs. 62% (2022). When comparing the hydration strategy of the intended LTR to the actual event, the agreement was 65% (2020) vs. 53% (2022). CONCLUSION: In this study, both half- and full-marathon runners reported some differences in hydration practices when comparing a LTR, an intended event, and an actual event. If runners mimic appropriate hydration practices during training when running an event, the risk of EAH may be decreased. Improvements in hydration practices of runners from 2020 to 2022 included hydration strategy selection and consistency among scenarios. The primary limitations of this study were the self-reported nature of this data and the small sample size.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Southern Utah University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.