Deciphering transcript architectural complexity in bacteria and archaea

RNA transcripts are potential therapeutic targets, yet bacterial transcripts have uncharacterized biodiversity. We developed an algorithm for transcript prediction called tp.py using it to predict transcripts (mRNA and other RNAs) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> K12 and E2348/69 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria), <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> strains Scott A and RO15 (Bacteria:Firmicute), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> strains SG17M and NN2 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria), and <i>Haloferax volcanii</i> (Archaea:Halobacteria). From >5 million <i>E. coli</i> K12 and >3 million <i>E. coli</i> E2348/69 newly generated Oxford Nanopore Technologies direct RNA sequencing reads, 2,487 K12 mRNAs and 1,844 E2348/69 mRNAs were predicted, with the K12 mRNAs containing more than half of the predicted <i>E. coli</i> K12 proteins. While the number of predicted transcripts varied by strain based on the amount of sequence data used, across all strains examined, the predicted average size of the mRNAs was 1.6-1.7 kbp, while the median size of the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) were 30-90 bp. Given the lack of bacterial and archaeal transcript annotation, most predictions were of novel transcripts, but we also predicted many previously characterized mRNAs and ncRNAs, including post-transcriptionally generated transcripts and small RNAs associated with pathogenesis in the <i>E. coli</i> E2348/69 <i>LEE</i> pathogenicity islands. We predicted small transcripts in the 100-200 bp range as well as >10 kbp transcripts for all strains, with the longest transcript for two of the seven strains being the <i>nuo</i> operon transcript, and for another two strains it was a phage/prophage transcript. This quick, easy, and reproducible method will facilitate the presentation of transcripts, and UTR predictions alongside coding sequences and protein predictions in bacterial genome annotation as important resources for the research community.IMPORTANCEOur understanding of bacterial and archaeal genes and genomes is largely focused on proteins since there have only been limited efforts to describe bacterial/archaeal RNA diversity. This contrasts with studies on the human genome, where transcripts were sequenced prior to the release of the human genome over two decades ago. We developed software for the quick, easy, and reproducible prediction of bacterial and archaeal transcripts from Oxford Nanopore Technologies direct RNA sequencing data. These predictions are urgently needed for more accurate studies examining bacterial/archaeal gene regulation, including regulation of virulence factors, and for the development of novel RNA-based therapeutics and diagnostics to combat bacterial pathogens, like those with extreme antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mBio
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02359-24
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deciphering transcript architectural complexity in bacteria and archaea

Kaylee J. Watson, Ricky S. Adkins, Jarrett F. Lebov, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp et al.
mBio
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Deciphering transcript architectural complexity in bacteria and archaea

Kaylee J. Watson, Ricky S. Adkins, Jarrett F. Lebov, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, Tyonna S. Tyson, Robin E. Bromley, Benjamin Sparklin, David A. Rasko, John Mattick, Christopher I. Holt
article en

Abstract

RNA transcripts are potential therapeutic targets, yet bacterial transcripts have uncharacterized biodiversity. We developed an algorithm for transcript prediction called tp.py using it to predict transcripts (mRNA and other RNAs) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> K12 and E2348/69 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria), <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> strains Scott A and RO15 (Bacteria:Firmicute), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> strains SG17M and NN2 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria), and <i>Haloferax volcanii</i> (Archaea:Halobacteria). From >5 million <i>E. coli</i> K12 and >3 million <i>E. coli</i> E2348/69 newly generated Oxford Nanopore Technologies direct RNA sequencing reads, 2,487 K12 mRNAs and 1,844 E2348/69 mRNAs were predicted, with the K12 mRNAs containing more than half of the predicted <i>E. coli</i> K12 proteins. While the number of predicted transcripts varied by strain based on the amount of sequence data used, across all strains examined, the predicted average size of the mRNAs was 1.6-1.7 kbp, while the median size of the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) were 30-90 bp. Given the lack of bacterial and archaeal transcript annotation, most predictions were of novel transcripts, but we also predicted many previously characterized mRNAs and ncRNAs, including post-transcriptionally generated transcripts and small RNAs associated with pathogenesis in the <i>E. coli</i> E2348/69 <i>LEE</i> pathogenicity islands. We predicted small transcripts in the 100-200 bp range as well as >10 kbp transcripts for all strains, with the longest transcript for two of the seven strains being the <i>nuo</i> operon transcript, and for another two strains it was a phage/prophage transcript. This quick, easy, and reproducible method will facilitate the presentation of transcripts, and UTR predictions alongside coding sequences and protein predictions in bacterial genome annotation as important resources for the research community.IMPORTANCEOur understanding of bacterial and archaeal genes and genomes is largely focused on proteins since there have only been limited efforts to describe bacterial/archaeal RNA diversity. This contrasts with studies on the human genome, where transcripts were sequenced prior to the release of the human genome over two decades ago. We developed software for the quick, easy, and reproducible prediction of bacterial and archaeal transcripts from Oxford Nanopore Technologies direct RNA sequencing data. These predictions are urgently needed for more accurate studies examining bacterial/archaeal gene regulation, including regulation of virulence factors, and for the development of novel RNA-based therapeutics and diagnostics to combat bacterial pathogens, like those with extreme antimicrobial resistance.

mBioVol. 15(10)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), U-M Rogel Cancer Center (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.