Determining Quality Movement Through Acceleration And Self-perception

A dynamic systems perspective suggests that a complex system (individual) self-organizes into unique and identifiable patterns. Describing an individual’s resulting movement pattern in terms of quality may best be accomplished through considering multiple inputs. Drawing connections between self-perception and direct measures may provide insights of movement quality. PURPOSE: To demonstrate a connection between movement performance and perception of movement skill during a squat motion. METHODS: Subjects (N = 22) were fitted with a 3-D accelerometer (AC) at sternum and asked to perform 20 squats after completing a questionnaire using a Lower Extremity (LE) Functional Scale to measure perception of LE function. AC values were recorded for each axis and analyzed using Python to determine repetition time (RPT) in s, amplitude (AMP) in g, and questionnaire responses (QR). Spearman rank ordering was computed to compare values between different measurements. Quality of movement was considered through three domains. Averages and standard deviations were computed for each axis of motion to find consistency. Coordination of movement was found by comparing values of RPT, AMP and QR. Optimality of movement was found by comparing the correlation of motion between augmented axes. RESULTS: Perception: QR = 69.5 (+ 20.1); Consistency: X-AMP = 0.14 g (+ 0.06); Y-AMP = 0.58 g (+ 0.34), Z-AMP = 0.82 g (+ 0.34); RPT = 1.61 s (+ 0.36); Coordination: Z-AMP to QR: r = .525 (p < 0.05); Optimality: Y/X-AMP to Z/X-AMP: r = 0.75 (p < 0.05); RPT-STD to QR r = 0.59 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects performed squats with minimal left-right motion and greater motion in front-back. A greater perception of movement ability occurred with squatters who had more front-back motion. Augmented views suggest there is a relationship between vertical and front to back motion with a minimal left to right motion. Most interesting is that a more consistent RPT may be related to a greater perception of movement. Findings suggest that movement quality of a squat may be demonstrated through acceleration values. Ideally, such insights may be used to better interpret various movements, advance assessment, programming and monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053256.79395.8e
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Quality Movement Through Acceleration And Self-perception

Debra Jackson, Myles Jay Polsgrove, Cade Kreider, Chris Pomerleau et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Determining Quality Movement Through Acceleration And Self-perception

Debra Jackson, Myles Jay Polsgrove, Cade Kreider, Chris Pomerleau, Joe Villavicencio
article en

Abstract

A dynamic systems perspective suggests that a complex system (individual) self-organizes into unique and identifiable patterns. Describing an individual’s resulting movement pattern in terms of quality may best be accomplished through considering multiple inputs. Drawing connections between self-perception and direct measures may provide insights of movement quality. PURPOSE: To demonstrate a connection between movement performance and perception of movement skill during a squat motion. METHODS: Subjects (N = 22) were fitted with a 3-D accelerometer (AC) at sternum and asked to perform 20 squats after completing a questionnaire using a Lower Extremity (LE) Functional Scale to measure perception of LE function. AC values were recorded for each axis and analyzed using Python to determine repetition time (RPT) in s, amplitude (AMP) in g, and questionnaire responses (QR). Spearman rank ordering was computed to compare values between different measurements. Quality of movement was considered through three domains. Averages and standard deviations were computed for each axis of motion to find consistency. Coordination of movement was found by comparing values of RPT, AMP and QR. Optimality of movement was found by comparing the correlation of motion between augmented axes. RESULTS: Perception: QR = 69.5 (+ 20.1); Consistency: X-AMP = 0.14 g (+ 0.06); Y-AMP = 0.58 g (+ 0.34), Z-AMP = 0.82 g (+ 0.34); RPT = 1.61 s (+ 0.36); Coordination: Z-AMP to QR: r = .525 (p < 0.05); Optimality: Y/X-AMP to Z/X-AMP: r = 0.75 (p < 0.05); RPT-STD to QR r = 0.59 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects performed squats with minimal left-right motion and greater motion in front-back. A greater perception of movement ability occurred with squatters who had more front-back motion. Augmented views suggest there is a relationship between vertical and front to back motion with a minimal left to right motion. Most interesting is that a more consistent RPT may be related to a greater perception of movement. Findings suggest that movement quality of a squat may be demonstrated through acceleration values. Ideally, such insights may be used to better interpret various movements, advance assessment, programming and monitoring.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Husson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.