Power And Velocity Improvements Of The Triceps Brachii Among Males Performing Unilateral Concentric Elbow Extensions

The triceps brachii (TB) plays an important role in sport and recreational exercise. Neuromuscular adaptations of the TB will vary depending on the exercise stimulus. PURPOSE: To evaluate increases in power and velocity of the TB in concentric unilateral elbow extension with a 3D isotonic stimulus. METHODS: We followed 26 males initiating unilateral exercise on the TB. All subjects performed at least 5 exercise sessions on separate days using a Proteus device. During session 1, subjects familiarized themselves with the equipment; performance was not analyzed owing to wide variance. One subject did not record non-dominant sets and was eliminated from analysis. For the remaining 25 subjects, sessions 2 through 10 were evaluated. We retained 15 subjects through session 8, and 7 subjects through session 10. Paired-sample t-tests compared dominant to non-dominant arms in power and velocity at sessions 2, 5, 8, and 10. Increases in power and velocity were also measured from sessions 2 to 5, 5 to 8, and 5 to 10. RESULTS: Subjects were 31.1 ± 16.4 years of age, 70.8 ± 4.1 inches tall, and weighed 178.1 ± 25.6 lbs. During session 2, dominant power was 84.2 ± 48.1 W and non-dominant power was 89.4 ± 51.1 W. There was no difference between arms at session 2 (p = 0.107), 5 (p = 0.972), 8 (p = 0.121), or 10 (p = 0.362). Between sessions 2 and 5, power increased 29.0 ± 48.7 W (34.5%) in the dominant arm (p = 0.007) and 23.7 ± 46.3 W (26.5%) in the non-dominant arm (p = 0.017). Between sessions 5 and 8, power did not increase in the dominant (p = 0.419) or non-dominant (p = 0.847) arms. Between sessions 5 and 10, power did not increase in the dominant (p = 0.598) or non-dominant (p = 0.464) arms. During session 2, dominant arm velocity was 4.4 ± 3.3 m/s2, and non-dominant velocity was 4.6 ± 3.6 m/s2 (p = 0.419). Between session 2 and session 5, velocity increased 23.9% in the dominant arm (p = 0.009) and 17.2% in the non-dominant arm (p = 0.007). There was no change between sessions 5 and 8 in dominant (p = 0.823) or non-dominant (p = 0.708) arms. There was no change between sessions 5 and 10 in dominant (p = 0.232) or non-dominant (p = 0.665) arms. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in power and velocity of the elbow extensors were observed within 5 unilateral exercise sessions on a Proteus device. Improvements stabilized after 5 sessions, implicating neuromuscular adaptations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053240.07818.0c
Primary Topic
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power And Velocity Improvements Of The Triceps Brachii Among Males Performing Unilateral Concentric Elbow Extensions

Saejel G. Mohan, Marie R. Jensen, Courtney D. Jensen, Jacob M. Cunha et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
article

Power And Velocity Improvements Of The Triceps Brachii Among Males Performing Unilateral Concentric Elbow Extensions

Saejel G. Mohan, Marie R. Jensen, Courtney D. Jensen, Jacob M. Cunha, Michael L. Bruneau
article en

Abstract

The triceps brachii (TB) plays an important role in sport and recreational exercise. Neuromuscular adaptations of the TB will vary depending on the exercise stimulus. PURPOSE: To evaluate increases in power and velocity of the TB in concentric unilateral elbow extension with a 3D isotonic stimulus. METHODS: We followed 26 males initiating unilateral exercise on the TB. All subjects performed at least 5 exercise sessions on separate days using a Proteus device. During session 1, subjects familiarized themselves with the equipment; performance was not analyzed owing to wide variance. One subject did not record non-dominant sets and was eliminated from analysis. For the remaining 25 subjects, sessions 2 through 10 were evaluated. We retained 15 subjects through session 8, and 7 subjects through session 10. Paired-sample t-tests compared dominant to non-dominant arms in power and velocity at sessions 2, 5, 8, and 10. Increases in power and velocity were also measured from sessions 2 to 5, 5 to 8, and 5 to 10. RESULTS: Subjects were 31.1 ± 16.4 years of age, 70.8 ± 4.1 inches tall, and weighed 178.1 ± 25.6 lbs. During session 2, dominant power was 84.2 ± 48.1 W and non-dominant power was 89.4 ± 51.1 W. There was no difference between arms at session 2 (p = 0.107), 5 (p = 0.972), 8 (p = 0.121), or 10 (p = 0.362). Between sessions 2 and 5, power increased 29.0 ± 48.7 W (34.5%) in the dominant arm (p = 0.007) and 23.7 ± 46.3 W (26.5%) in the non-dominant arm (p = 0.017). Between sessions 5 and 8, power did not increase in the dominant (p = 0.419) or non-dominant (p = 0.847) arms. Between sessions 5 and 10, power did not increase in the dominant (p = 0.598) or non-dominant (p = 0.464) arms. During session 2, dominant arm velocity was 4.4 ± 3.3 m/s2, and non-dominant velocity was 4.6 ± 3.6 m/s2 (p = 0.419). Between session 2 and session 5, velocity increased 23.9% in the dominant arm (p = 0.009) and 17.2% in the non-dominant arm (p = 0.007). There was no change between sessions 5 and 8 in dominant (p = 0.823) or non-dominant (p = 0.708) arms. There was no change between sessions 5 and 10 in dominant (p = 0.232) or non-dominant (p = 0.665) arms. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in power and velocity of the elbow extensors were observed within 5 unilateral exercise sessions on a Proteus device. Improvements stabilized after 5 sessions, implicating neuromuscular adaptations.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of the Pacific (US), Tufts University (US), Drexel University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.