Comparative Effects Of Aerobic, Resistance, Or Combined Exercise On Body Shape

PURPOSE: While exercise is known to produce anthropometric changes, few studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of different types of exercise training on body shape. This study examined body shape changes in response to 6 months of aerobic (AE), resistance (RE), or combined aerobic and resistance exercise (CE). METHODS: Participants were 60 inactive adults (54% women, 35-69 years) with overweight/obesity. Participants were randomized to AE only (n = 17), RE only (n = 17), CE (n = 16), or a no-exercise control (CON; n = 10) group for 6 months. Exercise was performed three times a week for 60 minutes (for CE, AE and RE were both performed for 30 minutes) at 50-80% of their maximum intensity. To assess body shape, participants wore tight fitting clothing, and a camera captured visual data through 360 degrees to generate a 3D avatar. The 3D scanner produced an index score (range 0-100), termed the Body Shape Rating (BSR) based on whole body anthropometric measures (e.g., BMI, waist circumference) with higher scores indicating higher body density and lower body volume (e.g., lower waist circumference). Participants exhibiting increased BSR from baseline to 6 months were categorized as having improved BSR, and group differences were evaluated with chi square tests. BSR change scores were then compared between exercise groups with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s post hoc tests were performed for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: There were no differences in BSR between groups at baseline (p = 0.44). BSR improved in 59% of AE, 71% RE, 75% of CE, and 2% of CON participants, with significant between group differences (p = 0.03). There were group differences in BSR change scores (p = 0.004) with significant differences between AE and CON (mean difference [MD] = 15.19, p = 0.005), and CE and CON (MD = 11.73, p = 0.047). Despite a lack of statistical significance between RE and CON (p = 0.07), the MD (10.78) was similar to that of CE and CON, and not significantly different between RE and AE (p = 0.64), RE and CE (p = 0.99), and AE and CE (p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that all types of exercise improved body shape in the majority of participants (60-75%). AE provided the greatest magnitudes of body shape improvement but in fewer participants, while CE and RE lead to more consistent, albeit smaller, improvements. NIH Grant R01HL133069

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053536.52236.18
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effects Of Aerobic, Resistance, Or Combined Exercise On Body Shape

Angelique G. Brellenthin, Duck-chul Lee, Caleb F. Brandner
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Comparative Effects Of Aerobic, Resistance, Or Combined Exercise On Body Shape

Angelique G. Brellenthin, Duck-chul Lee, Caleb F. Brandner
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: While exercise is known to produce anthropometric changes, few studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of different types of exercise training on body shape. This study examined body shape changes in response to 6 months of aerobic (AE), resistance (RE), or combined aerobic and resistance exercise (CE). METHODS: Participants were 60 inactive adults (54% women, 35-69 years) with overweight/obesity. Participants were randomized to AE only (n = 17), RE only (n = 17), CE (n = 16), or a no-exercise control (CON; n = 10) group for 6 months. Exercise was performed three times a week for 60 minutes (for CE, AE and RE were both performed for 30 minutes) at 50-80% of their maximum intensity. To assess body shape, participants wore tight fitting clothing, and a camera captured visual data through 360 degrees to generate a 3D avatar. The 3D scanner produced an index score (range 0-100), termed the Body Shape Rating (BSR) based on whole body anthropometric measures (e.g., BMI, waist circumference) with higher scores indicating higher body density and lower body volume (e.g., lower waist circumference). Participants exhibiting increased BSR from baseline to 6 months were categorized as having improved BSR, and group differences were evaluated with chi square tests. BSR change scores were then compared between exercise groups with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s post hoc tests were performed for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: There were no differences in BSR between groups at baseline (p = 0.44). BSR improved in 59% of AE, 71% RE, 75% of CE, and 2% of CON participants, with significant between group differences (p = 0.03). There were group differences in BSR change scores (p = 0.004) with significant differences between AE and CON (mean difference [MD] = 15.19, p = 0.005), and CE and CON (MD = 11.73, p = 0.047). Despite a lack of statistical significance between RE and CON (p = 0.07), the MD (10.78) was similar to that of CE and CON, and not significantly different between RE and AE (p = 0.64), RE and CE (p = 0.99), and AE and CE (p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that all types of exercise improved body shape in the majority of participants (60-75%). AE provided the greatest magnitudes of body shape improvement but in fewer participants, while CE and RE lead to more consistent, albeit smaller, improvements. NIH Grant R01HL133069

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Iowa State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.