The Joint Association Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness And Body Mass Index On Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing globally and is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is proposed as a clinical vital sign and has been shown to attenuate the CVD risks associated with obesity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the joint relationship of CRF and body mass index (BMI; normal - 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight - 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, and obese - >30 kg/m2) on CVD mortality risk. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SportDiscus) were searched following registration on PROSPERO for articles meeting the following a priori criteria for inclusion: 1) published between January 1980 and February 2023, 2) prospective cohort studies, 3) CRF assessed using a maximal or VO2peak exercise test, 4) BMI was reported and directly measured in clinic, 5) joint impact of CRF and BMI on all-cause mortality or CVD mortality were analyzed, 6) the reference group was normal weight, fit individuals. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a three-level, restricted maximum likelihood estimation random-effects model, with robust variance estimation. The reference group was compared to the following: normal weight-unfit, overweight-unfit and fit, obese-unfit and fit. α was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included in the final analyses with the sample age ranging from 42.4-53.5 years and follow-up ranging from 8.1-26 years. Compared to the reference group (normal weight-fit), overweight-fit (HR [95%CI]: 1.50 [0.82-2.76]) and obese-fit (1.62 [0.87-3.01]) had a similar risk of CVD mortality. In contrast, those who were normal weight-unfit (2.04 [1.32-3.14]), overweight-unfit (2.58 [1.48-4.52]), and obese-unfit (3.35 [1.17-9.61]) demonstrated two- to three-fold greater CVD mortality risks. CONCLUSIONS: CRF is a strong predictor of CVD mortality and attenuates risks associated with overweight and obesity. These data support the inclusion of CRF as a clinical vital sign and suggest that routine measurement might enhance risk classification and improve patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053268.79346.dd
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Joint Association Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness And Body Mass Index On Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Meta-analysis

Siddhartha S. Angadi, Nathan R. Weeldreyer, Zachary S. Leicht, Jason D. Allen et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

The Joint Association Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness And Body Mass Index On Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Meta-analysis

Siddhartha S. Angadi, Nathan R. Weeldreyer, Zachary S. Leicht, Jason D. Allen, Glenn A. Gaesser, Craig Paterson, Jeison C. De Guzman
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing globally and is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is proposed as a clinical vital sign and has been shown to attenuate the CVD risks associated with obesity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the joint relationship of CRF and body mass index (BMI; normal - 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight - 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, and obese - >30 kg/m2) on CVD mortality risk. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SportDiscus) were searched following registration on PROSPERO for articles meeting the following a priori criteria for inclusion: 1) published between January 1980 and February 2023, 2) prospective cohort studies, 3) CRF assessed using a maximal or VO2peak exercise test, 4) BMI was reported and directly measured in clinic, 5) joint impact of CRF and BMI on all-cause mortality or CVD mortality were analyzed, 6) the reference group was normal weight, fit individuals. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a three-level, restricted maximum likelihood estimation random-effects model, with robust variance estimation. The reference group was compared to the following: normal weight-unfit, overweight-unfit and fit, obese-unfit and fit. α was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included in the final analyses with the sample age ranging from 42.4-53.5 years and follow-up ranging from 8.1-26 years. Compared to the reference group (normal weight-fit), overweight-fit (HR [95%CI]: 1.50 [0.82-2.76]) and obese-fit (1.62 [0.87-3.01]) had a similar risk of CVD mortality. In contrast, those who were normal weight-unfit (2.04 [1.32-3.14]), overweight-unfit (2.58 [1.48-4.52]), and obese-unfit (3.35 [1.17-9.61]) demonstrated two- to three-fold greater CVD mortality risks. CONCLUSIONS: CRF is a strong predictor of CVD mortality and attenuates risks associated with overweight and obesity. These data support the inclusion of CRF as a clinical vital sign and suggest that routine measurement might enhance risk classification and improve patient care.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
At Bristol (GB), University of Virginia (US), Arizona State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.