Comparison Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Gait

Previously we found that walking on a non-motorized treadmill (NMT) elicited greater EMG activity from plantar flexor (PF) muscles compared to walking overground (OG) and on a motorized treadmill (MT). PURPOSE: To compare kinematics, kinetics and EMG in OG, MT, and NMT walking. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy adults (24.4 ± 7.2 yrs, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 75.4 ± 13.1 kg) completed one trial of walking at 3.0 mph in each of three modes (OG, MT, NMT). All dependent measures were averaged across a minimum of two consecutive gait cycles. Surface EMG of the Gastrocnemius (GA), and Tibialis Anterior (TA) was collected at 1000 Hz from which peak EMG RMS was measured. Lower extremity kinematics were recorded at 100 Hz from which PF ROM was measured. Force normal to the plantar surface of the foot was measured at 200 Hz from which peak force (PkF), maximum loading rate (LR), and contact time (CT) and step rate (SR) were measured. Separate one-way repeated measures ANOVA’s were used to compare dependent measures across gait mode. RESULTS: GA muscle activity was greater (p < 0.05) in NMT than MT or OG. No differences in TA activity or PF ROM between modes was observed. No difference in the amount of plantar flexion was observed between modes. SR was higher (p < 0.05) and CT lower (p < 0.05) on MT and NMT than OG. PkF was lower (p < 0.05) on the NMT than either MT or OG. LR was higher on MT (p < 0.05) and NMT (p = 0.06) than OG. CONCLUSION: Use of NMT accentuates plantar flexor activity when walking with no observed kinematic changes in ankle movement while reduced CT and increased SR resulted in a higher LR but lower PkF. These data suggest that use of a NMT may provide a viable means to elicit enhanced neuromuscular activity with minimal changes to the gait pattern which may offer an intervention to slow or minimize age-related declines in gait. - PF Pk RMS EMG (mv) DF Pk RMS EMG (mv) PF ROM (deg) Peak F (BW) LOADING RATE (BW/s) CONTACT TIME (ms) STEP RATE (steps/min) OG 0.12 (0.08) 0.11 (0.07) 31.9 (4.4) 1.25 (0.06) 10.4 (1.9) 705 (46) 90.0 (6.1) MT 0.11 (0.08) 0.10 (0.08) 30.2 (8.2) 1.23 (0.06) 11.4 (2.1)1 681 (35)1 94.3 (5.6)1,2 NMT 0.17 (0.11)1,2 0.12 (0.10) 30.3 (5.3) 1.20 (0.06)1,2 11.2 (2.2) 644 (35)1,2 101.9 (7.8)1,2 1significantly different than OG (p < 0.05)2significantly different than MT (p < 0.05)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053176.17217.6e
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Gait

Scott P McLean, Kevan D. Kennedy, Emma C. Williams
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Comparison Of Overground, Motorized Treadmill And Non-motorized Treadmill Gait

Scott P McLean, Kevan D. Kennedy, Emma C. Williams
article en

Abstract

Previously we found that walking on a non-motorized treadmill (NMT) elicited greater EMG activity from plantar flexor (PF) muscles compared to walking overground (OG) and on a motorized treadmill (MT). PURPOSE: To compare kinematics, kinetics and EMG in OG, MT, and NMT walking. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy adults (24.4 ± 7.2 yrs, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 75.4 ± 13.1 kg) completed one trial of walking at 3.0 mph in each of three modes (OG, MT, NMT). All dependent measures were averaged across a minimum of two consecutive gait cycles. Surface EMG of the Gastrocnemius (GA), and Tibialis Anterior (TA) was collected at 1000 Hz from which peak EMG RMS was measured. Lower extremity kinematics were recorded at 100 Hz from which PF ROM was measured. Force normal to the plantar surface of the foot was measured at 200 Hz from which peak force (PkF), maximum loading rate (LR), and contact time (CT) and step rate (SR) were measured. Separate one-way repeated measures ANOVA’s were used to compare dependent measures across gait mode. RESULTS: GA muscle activity was greater (p < 0.05) in NMT than MT or OG. No differences in TA activity or PF ROM between modes was observed. No difference in the amount of plantar flexion was observed between modes. SR was higher (p < 0.05) and CT lower (p < 0.05) on MT and NMT than OG. PkF was lower (p < 0.05) on the NMT than either MT or OG. LR was higher on MT (p < 0.05) and NMT (p = 0.06) than OG. CONCLUSION: Use of NMT accentuates plantar flexor activity when walking with no observed kinematic changes in ankle movement while reduced CT and increased SR resulted in a higher LR but lower PkF. These data suggest that use of a NMT may provide a viable means to elicit enhanced neuromuscular activity with minimal changes to the gait pattern which may offer an intervention to slow or minimize age-related declines in gait. - PF Pk RMS EMG (mv) DF Pk RMS EMG (mv) PF ROM (deg) Peak F (BW) LOADING RATE (BW/s) CONTACT TIME (ms) STEP RATE (steps/min) OG 0.12 (0.08) 0.11 (0.07) 31.9 (4.4) 1.25 (0.06) 10.4 (1.9) 705 (46) 90.0 (6.1) MT 0.11 (0.08) 0.10 (0.08) 30.2 (8.2) 1.23 (0.06) 11.4 (2.1)1 681 (35)1 94.3 (5.6)1,2 NMT 0.17 (0.11)1,2 0.12 (0.10) 30.3 (5.3) 1.20 (0.06)1,2 11.2 (2.2) 644 (35)1,2 101.9 (7.8)1,2 1significantly different than OG (p < 0.05)2significantly different than MT (p < 0.05)

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Southwestern University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.