The Association Of Habitual Running Patterns And Walking Gait Mechanics.

Running with a mid-foot (MFS) or fore-foot strike (FFS) can result in a proximal to distal shift of muscle power in which there is less contribution of the quadriceps and more of the plantar flexors. This shift is notably reflected by a larger peak PF torque and positive and negative powers compared to rear-footstrike (RFS) running. However, it is unknown if the utilization of more distal joints carries over to a runner's walking gait which is a RFS pattern. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of foot-strike patterns utilized during running on walking gait mechanics. METHODS: A subset of data from the 4HAIE study was used to assess the walking mechanics of 12 runners divided based on running mechanics (Table 1). Participants walked overground at their preferred walking speed while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Between-group differences for variables of interest (lower extremity joint moments, ankle joint power, GRFs) were determined using independent t-tests and effect sizes (ES). RESULTS: MFS runners demonstrated greater ankle joint utilization than RFS runners during walking (Table 2). MFS runners generated greater ankle power than RFS runners (p = 0.018, ES = 0.7). Additionally, MFS runners exhibited larger knee flexion and hip extension moments than RFS runners (p = 0.02, ES = 0.7; p = 0.024, ES = 0.7). CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest a potential carryover effect from the utilization of more distal joints in MFS running to walking gait, highlighting a link between running and walking mechanics. Table 1. - Participant Demographics MFS RFS Sex 4F, 2M 3F, 3M Age (years) 33 ± 12 34 ± 11 Mass (kg) 62.88 ± 10.32 71.71 ± 17.80 BMI 22.68 ± 3.12 23.91 ± 3.17 Distance/week (km) (range) 41-50 41-50 Table 2. - Kinetic Variables MFS RFS p Cohen’s d Ankle power (W/kg)* 4.10 ± 0.5 3.16 ± 0.6 0.018 0.7 Plantarflexor moment (Nm/kg) -1.80 ± 0.3 -1.60 ± 0.2 0.14 0.6 Hip extension moment (Nm/kg)* -1.73 ± 0.2 -1.27 ± 0.3 0.024 0.7 Knee flexion moment (Nm/kg)* -0.77 ± 0.1 -0.560 ± 0.2 0.029 0.7 A/P GRF (N/BW) -0.29 ± 0.01 -0.25 ± 0.04 0.062 0.6 vGRF 1st max (N/BW) 1.36 ± 0.13 1.21 ± 0.1 0.069 0.6 *denotes significant difference, p < 0.05 This research was funded by Program 4 HAIE—Healthy Aging in Industrial Environment (grant number: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000798)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053172.62519.dc
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association Of Habitual Running Patterns And Walking Gait Mechanics.

Julia Freedman Silvernail, Daniel Jandačka, Brianne Borgia, Jaroslav Uchytil et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

The Association Of Habitual Running Patterns And Walking Gait Mechanics.

Julia Freedman Silvernail, Daniel Jandačka, Brianne Borgia, Jaroslav Uchytil, Joseph Hamill
article en

Abstract

Running with a mid-foot (MFS) or fore-foot strike (FFS) can result in a proximal to distal shift of muscle power in which there is less contribution of the quadriceps and more of the plantar flexors. This shift is notably reflected by a larger peak PF torque and positive and negative powers compared to rear-footstrike (RFS) running. However, it is unknown if the utilization of more distal joints carries over to a runner's walking gait which is a RFS pattern. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of foot-strike patterns utilized during running on walking gait mechanics. METHODS: A subset of data from the 4HAIE study was used to assess the walking mechanics of 12 runners divided based on running mechanics (Table 1). Participants walked overground at their preferred walking speed while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Between-group differences for variables of interest (lower extremity joint moments, ankle joint power, GRFs) were determined using independent t-tests and effect sizes (ES). RESULTS: MFS runners demonstrated greater ankle joint utilization than RFS runners during walking (Table 2). MFS runners generated greater ankle power than RFS runners (p = 0.018, ES = 0.7). Additionally, MFS runners exhibited larger knee flexion and hip extension moments than RFS runners (p = 0.02, ES = 0.7; p = 0.024, ES = 0.7). CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest a potential carryover effect from the utilization of more distal joints in MFS running to walking gait, highlighting a link between running and walking mechanics. Table 1. - Participant Demographics MFS RFS Sex 4F, 2M 3F, 3M Age (years) 33 ± 12 34 ± 11 Mass (kg) 62.88 ± 10.32 71.71 ± 17.80 BMI 22.68 ± 3.12 23.91 ± 3.17 Distance/week (km) (range) 41-50 41-50 Table 2. - Kinetic Variables MFS RFS p Cohen’s d Ankle power (W/kg)* 4.10 ± 0.5 3.16 ± 0.6 0.018 0.7 Plantarflexor moment (Nm/kg) -1.80 ± 0.3 -1.60 ± 0.2 0.14 0.6 Hip extension moment (Nm/kg)* -1.73 ± 0.2 -1.27 ± 0.3 0.024 0.7 Knee flexion moment (Nm/kg)* -0.77 ± 0.1 -0.560 ± 0.2 0.029 0.7 A/P GRF (N/BW) -0.29 ± 0.01 -0.25 ± 0.04 0.062 0.6 vGRF 1st max (N/BW) 1.36 ± 0.13 1.21 ± 0.1 0.069 0.6 *denotes significant difference, p < 0.05 This research was funded by Program 4 HAIE—Healthy Aging in Industrial Environment (grant number: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000798)

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Hartford (US), University of Ostrava (CZ), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.