Pulse Wave Reflection Differs With Different Orders Of Resistance Exercise In Resistance-trained Young Women

Varying the orders of upper- and lower-body resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to induce different cardiovascular responses in active men. However, various orders of upper- and lower-body RE on pulse wave reflection in resistance-trained young women is unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different orders of upper-and lower-body RE on pulse wave reflection in resistance-trained young women. METHODS: Twelve resistance-trained young women (22 ± 2 yrs) completed the study. Pulse wave reflection was assessed at rest, 10 (R1), and 20 (R2) minutes after either upper- and lower-body RE (UL) or lower- and upper-body RE (LU) for 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 75% 1-repetition maximum with 90-second and 2-minute rests between sets and exercises, respectively. The upper- and lower-body RE consisted of latissimus dorsi pulldown and incline chest press, and knee extension and knee flexion, respectively. RESULTS: Exercise volume between UL and LU was similar (p = 0.387). LU significantly (p < 0.05) elevated augmentation pressure (rest: 5.1 ± 2.7 mmHg; R1: 7.9 ± 4.7 mmHg; R2: 3.8 ± 3.6 mmHg) and augmentation index (AIx) (rest: 15.2 ± 7.6%; R1: 22.4 ± 11.5%; R2: 10.9 ± 10.2%) at R1 compared to rest and R2 while UL significantly (p < 0.05) reduced AP (rest: 5.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; R1: 5.3 ± 3.4 mmHg; R2: 1.9 ± 1.6 mmHg) and AIx (rest: 17.3 ± 7.8%; R1: 15.4 ± 8.3%; R2: 7.3 ± 5.9%) at R2 compared to rest and R1 with significantly higher AIx at R1 in LU compared to UL. AIx normalized at 75 bpm significantly (p < 0.05) increased (UL: rest: 8.7 ± 10.6%; R1: 19.2 ± 9.3%; R2: 10.2 ± 7.4%; LU: rest: 8.7 ± 8.7%; R1: 25.1 ± 12.2%; R2: 12.1 ± 10.6%) at R1 compared to rest and R2 in both UL and LU. Heart rate significantly (p < 0.05) augmented (UL: rest: 59 ± 7 bpm: R1: 82 ± 13 bpm; R2: 81 ± 11 bpm; LU: rest: 61 ± 8 bpm; R1: 80 ± 11 bpm; R2: 77 ± 9 bpm) at R1 and R2 compared to rest in both UL and LU. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that different RE orders have different effects on pulse wave reflection. In addition, LU significantly increased pulse wave reflection more than UL which increased workload to the cardiovascular system in resistance-trained young women. Performing UL, rather than LU may provide extra time to recover the cardiovascular system from upper-body RE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001058892.48232.ab
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulse Wave Reflection Differs With Different Orders Of Resistance Exercise In Resistance-trained Young Women

Yu Lun Tai, Omar Garcia, Ryan Russell, Andrea Toledo et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Pulse Wave Reflection Differs With Different Orders Of Resistance Exercise In Resistance-trained Young Women

Yu Lun Tai, Omar Garcia, Ryan Russell, Andrea Toledo, Alissa Olvera
article en

Abstract

Varying the orders of upper- and lower-body resistance exercise (RE) has been shown to induce different cardiovascular responses in active men. However, various orders of upper- and lower-body RE on pulse wave reflection in resistance-trained young women is unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different orders of upper-and lower-body RE on pulse wave reflection in resistance-trained young women. METHODS: Twelve resistance-trained young women (22 ± 2 yrs) completed the study. Pulse wave reflection was assessed at rest, 10 (R1), and 20 (R2) minutes after either upper- and lower-body RE (UL) or lower- and upper-body RE (LU) for 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 75% 1-repetition maximum with 90-second and 2-minute rests between sets and exercises, respectively. The upper- and lower-body RE consisted of latissimus dorsi pulldown and incline chest press, and knee extension and knee flexion, respectively. RESULTS: Exercise volume between UL and LU was similar (p = 0.387). LU significantly (p < 0.05) elevated augmentation pressure (rest: 5.1 ± 2.7 mmHg; R1: 7.9 ± 4.7 mmHg; R2: 3.8 ± 3.6 mmHg) and augmentation index (AIx) (rest: 15.2 ± 7.6%; R1: 22.4 ± 11.5%; R2: 10.9 ± 10.2%) at R1 compared to rest and R2 while UL significantly (p < 0.05) reduced AP (rest: 5.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; R1: 5.3 ± 3.4 mmHg; R2: 1.9 ± 1.6 mmHg) and AIx (rest: 17.3 ± 7.8%; R1: 15.4 ± 8.3%; R2: 7.3 ± 5.9%) at R2 compared to rest and R1 with significantly higher AIx at R1 in LU compared to UL. AIx normalized at 75 bpm significantly (p < 0.05) increased (UL: rest: 8.7 ± 10.6%; R1: 19.2 ± 9.3%; R2: 10.2 ± 7.4%; LU: rest: 8.7 ± 8.7%; R1: 25.1 ± 12.2%; R2: 12.1 ± 10.6%) at R1 compared to rest and R2 in both UL and LU. Heart rate significantly (p < 0.05) augmented (UL: rest: 59 ± 7 bpm: R1: 82 ± 13 bpm; R2: 81 ± 11 bpm; LU: rest: 61 ± 8 bpm; R1: 80 ± 11 bpm; R2: 77 ± 9 bpm) at R1 and R2 compared to rest in both UL and LU. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that different RE orders have different effects on pulse wave reflection. In addition, LU significantly increased pulse wave reflection more than UL which increased workload to the cardiovascular system in resistance-trained young women. Performing UL, rather than LU may provide extra time to recover the cardiovascular system from upper-body RE.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.