An analysis of direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has become incredibly popular for assessing health risk related to specific diseases. However, how this risk is conveyed and whether the limitations of the tests are fully communicated can impact how customers interpret results. Through a qualitative content analysis of three different DTC genetic testing online portals, we examine how companies communicate relative and absolute health risks, the extent to which limitations are communicated, and how this information is presented. Findings suggest that relative risk was more prominently communicated than absolute risk and that it was used to organize and prioritize results. Further, risk information was often communicated using statistical terms and concepts that may not be accessible to all users. Test limitations that were communicated included the inability to diagnose a disease, the importance of lifestyle factors, and that the tests do not account for all genetic variants. Although companies included this information, it was not visually prominent.
Authors
- Nicole Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-4969)
- Kaylynne Wallace
- Matthew S. VanDyke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-3099)
- Alan Abitbol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-4133)
- Christina Meneses
Institutions
- University of Alabama (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Tampa (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Published
- 2024-09-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1967
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.10
Funders
- Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences