The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress…

Forty years ago, Dyer summarized team science research, finding that in many areas, we lacked theoretical backing and empirical evidence—sometimes to the point of meagerness. This commentary summarizes the last four decades of team research with Dyer’s seven leading questions—finding our progress far from scant. We have uncovered groundbreaking theories, moved past understanding teamwork as only the task, researched hundreds of team emergent states, and conducted vast meta-analytic research while continuing to uncover how to make teamwork more effective and what conditions foster greatness. We also find we continue to require work in other areas, from developing better methodological practices to considering teamwork’s dynamic nature. This commentary seeks to revisit team science’s most significant breakthroughs, such as the vast improvement of team training research, and weak spots, such as our continued lack of longitudinal research. By doing so, we highlight how much progress we can make together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241274119
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress…

Gabriela Fernández Castillo, Rylee M. Linhardt, Eduardo Salas
9 citations
Small Group Research
Team Dynamics and Performance
5.79
article

The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress…

Gabriela Fernández Castillo, Rylee M. Linhardt, Eduardo Salas
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Forty years ago, Dyer summarized team science research, finding that in many areas, we lacked theoretical backing and empirical evidence—sometimes to the point of meagerness. This commentary summarizes the last four decades of team research with Dyer’s seven leading questions—finding our progress far from scant. We have uncovered groundbreaking theories, moved past understanding teamwork as only the task, researched hundreds of team emergent states, and conducted vast meta-analytic research while continuing to uncover how to make teamwork more effective and what conditions foster greatness. We also find we continue to require work in other areas, from developing better methodological practices to considering teamwork’s dynamic nature. This commentary seeks to revisit team science’s most significant breakthroughs, such as the vast improvement of team training research, and weak spots, such as our continued lack of longitudinal research. By doing so, we highlight how much progress we can make together.

Small Group ResearchVol. 56(3)
Rice University (US)
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Team Dynamics and Performance
5.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.