Political Deepfakes Are as Credible as Other Fake Media and (Sometimes) Real Media

There is widespread concern that political “deepfakes”—fabricated videos synthesized by deep learning—pose an epistemic threat to democracy as a uniquely credible form of misinformation. To test this hypothesis, we created novel deepfakes in collaboration with industry partners and a professional actor. We then experimentally assess whether deepfakes are distinctly deceptive and find that deepfakes are approximately as credible as misinformation communicated through text or audio. However, in a follow-up discernment task, subjects often confuse authentic videos for deepfakes if the video depicts an elite in their political party in a scandal. Moreover, informational interventions and accuracy primes only sometimes (and somewhat) attenuate deepfakes’ effects. In sum, our results show that while deepfakes may not be uniquely deceptive, they may still erode trust in media and increase partisan polarization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732990
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Deepfakes Are as Credible as Other Fake Media and (Sometimes) Real Media

Soubhik Barari, Kevin Munger, Christopher Lucas
15 citations
The Journal of Politics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
14.72
article

Political Deepfakes Are as Credible as Other Fake Media and (Sometimes) Real Media

Soubhik Barari, Kevin Munger, Christopher Lucas
article en
15 citations

Abstract

There is widespread concern that political “deepfakes”—fabricated videos synthesized by deep learning—pose an epistemic threat to democracy as a uniquely credible form of misinformation. To test this hypothesis, we created novel deepfakes in collaboration with industry partners and a professional actor. We then experimentally assess whether deepfakes are distinctly deceptive and find that deepfakes are approximately as credible as misinformation communicated through text or audio. However, in a follow-up discernment task, subjects often confuse authentic videos for deepfakes if the video depicts an elite in their political party in a scandal. Moreover, informational interventions and accuracy primes only sometimes (and somewhat) attenuate deepfakes’ effects. In sum, our results show that while deepfakes may not be uniquely deceptive, they may still erode trust in media and increase partisan polarization.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Chicago (US), European University Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
14.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.