Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity

The US federal government routinely commissions policy research from the private sector, and this research, in turn, often forms an evidence base for future policy decisions. Given its potential to influence the policymaking process, I argue that the procurement power over research production is a previously unappreciated tool in the president’s policy arsenal. Focusing on federally funded policy research and using an original dataset of federal procurement from 2000 to 2019, I explore how government-funded research can enhance a president’s prospects for accomplishing political goals. The analysis shows that agencies that are prioritized by the president award larger research contracts. Further, new presidential administrations are more likely to discontinue research initiated by their predecessors. The implication is that policy research commissioned by the federal government is a commodity for the executive, harnessed in service of political agendas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732972
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity

Rachel Augustine Potter
1 citations
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
article

Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity

Rachel Augustine Potter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The US federal government routinely commissions policy research from the private sector, and this research, in turn, often forms an evidence base for future policy decisions. Given its potential to influence the policymaking process, I argue that the procurement power over research production is a previously unappreciated tool in the president’s policy arsenal. Focusing on federally funded policy research and using an original dataset of federal procurement from 2000 to 2019, I explore how government-funded research can enhance a president’s prospects for accomplishing political goals. The analysis shows that agencies that are prioritized by the president award larger research contracts. Further, new presidential administrations are more likely to discontinue research initiated by their predecessors. The implication is that policy research commissioned by the federal government is a commodity for the executive, harnessed in service of political agendas.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(2)
University of Virginia (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity — Rachel Augustine Potter · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS