Does income transparency affect support for redistribution? Evidence from Finland’s tax day

This article examines whether income transparency—the public release of citizens’ income information—affects support for redistribution. We leverage a quasi-experiment in Finland, where every year on the so-called tax day, the authorities release income information on Finland’s top earners to the public. To identify causal effects, we compare respondents who took part in the European Social Survey shortly before and after the event. We find that the tax day increases perceptions that earnings of the top 10% are unfair but that public support for redistribution remains largely unaffected. A notable exception are top earners, who decrease their support for redistribution, and young people, who increase their support for redistribution. Our results highlight the scope conditions of previous experimental studies and suggest that increasing exposure to inequality through a real-world policy, rather than experimental treatments, may trigger only marginal changes in support for redistribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732955
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does income transparency affect support for redistribution? Evidence from Finland’s tax day

Maurice Dunaiski, Janne Tukiainen
The Journal of Politics
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Does income transparency affect support for redistribution? Evidence from Finland’s tax day

Maurice Dunaiski, Janne Tukiainen
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether income transparency—the public release of citizens’ income information—affects support for redistribution. We leverage a quasi-experiment in Finland, where every year on the so-called tax day, the authorities release income information on Finland’s top earners to the public. To identify causal effects, we compare respondents who took part in the European Social Survey shortly before and after the event. We find that the tax day increases perceptions that earnings of the top 10% are unfair but that public support for redistribution remains largely unaffected. A notable exception are top earners, who decrease their support for redistribution, and young people, who increase their support for redistribution. Our results highlight the scope conditions of previous experimental studies and suggest that increasing exposure to inequality through a real-world policy, rather than experimental treatments, may trigger only marginal changes in support for redistribution.

The Journal of Politics
University of Turku (FI), VATT Institute for Economic Research (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.