Measuring the Contribution of Voting Blocs to Election Outcomes

To interpret elections, social scientists and media pundits often ask: How much did particular groups, or voting blocs, contribute to a candidate’s vote total? The default tool for studying voter behavior—regressions of vote choice on voter characteristics—is useful for evaluating correlates and determinants of vote choice but is incapable of assessing how many votes a group contributes. Accounting for votes also requires knowing a group’s size and its turnout rate. We introduce a set of tools for estimating how many votes a bloc gives to a candidate, how voting bloc patterns differ from prior elections, and how support changes under counterfactuals. We apply these tools to study US presidential elections, demonstrating that there is little evidence to show Black and Latino voters are shifting toward Republicans in recent elections and that Donald Trump’s support was concentrated among voters with moderate attitudes toward racial outgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732964
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Contribution of Voting Blocs to Election Outcomes

Cole Tanigawa-Lau, William Marble, Justin Grimmer
4 citations
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
6.69
article

Measuring the Contribution of Voting Blocs to Election Outcomes

Cole Tanigawa-Lau, William Marble, Justin Grimmer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

To interpret elections, social scientists and media pundits often ask: How much did particular groups, or voting blocs, contribute to a candidate’s vote total? The default tool for studying voter behavior—regressions of vote choice on voter characteristics—is useful for evaluating correlates and determinants of vote choice but is incapable of assessing how many votes a group contributes. Accounting for votes also requires knowing a group’s size and its turnout rate. We introduce a set of tools for estimating how many votes a bloc gives to a candidate, how voting bloc patterns differ from prior elections, and how support changes under counterfactuals. We apply these tools to study US presidential elections, demonstrating that there is little evidence to show Black and Latino voters are shifting toward Republicans in recent elections and that Donald Trump’s support was concentrated among voters with moderate attitudes toward racial outgroups.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(3)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring the Contribution of Voting Blocs to Election Outcomes — Cole Tanigawa-Lau, William Marble, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS