Comparison of permeable cell culture inserts for use in culture of a human in vitro air–liquid interface model system

In this study, we compared 12 mm cell culture inserts with permeable polyester membranes (0.4 μm pores) from two different manufacturers: CELLTREAT® and Corning®. Physical dimensions and masses of the inserts were found to be very similar between the two brands, with CELLTREAT® inserts having a slightly smaller diameter and growth area (11.91 mm; 1.11 cm2) compared to Corning® Transwells® (12 mm; 1.13 cm2). We compared cell differentiation outcomes of human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) at air-liquid interface grown on inserts from the two different manufacturers, including trans-epithelial electrical resistance, ciliary beat frequency, ciliated area, and gene expression. HNECs from three male donors were used for all endpoints. No statistically significant differences were observed between paired cultures grown on different brands of insert. In conclusion, these inserts are comparable for use with airway epithelial cell model systems and likely do not impact cellular differentiation or cell culture quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/7mx9-w110
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of permeable cell culture inserts for use in culture of a human in vitro air–liquid interface model system

Syed Masood, Cameron P. Worden, Stephanie A. Brocke, Ilona Jaspers et al.
1 links
UNC Libraries
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Comparison of permeable cell culture inserts for use in culture of a human in vitro air–liquid interface model system

Syed Masood, Cameron P. Worden, Stephanie A. Brocke, Ilona Jaspers, Adam M. Speen
article en

Abstract

In this study, we compared 12 mm cell culture inserts with permeable polyester membranes (0.4 μm pores) from two different manufacturers: CELLTREAT® and Corning®. Physical dimensions and masses of the inserts were found to be very similar between the two brands, with CELLTREAT® inserts having a slightly smaller diameter and growth area (11.91 mm; 1.11 cm2) compared to Corning® Transwells® (12 mm; 1.13 cm2). We compared cell differentiation outcomes of human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) at air-liquid interface grown on inserts from the two different manufacturers, including trans-epithelial electrical resistance, ciliary beat frequency, ciliated area, and gene expression. HNECs from three male donors were used for all endpoints. No statistically significant differences were observed between paired cultures grown on different brands of insert. In conclusion, these inserts are comparable for use with airway epithelial cell model systems and likely do not impact cellular differentiation or cell culture quality.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.