Learning to quantify uncertainty in off-target activity for CRISPR guide RNAs

CRISPR-based genome editing technologies have revolutionised the field of molecular biology, offering unprecedented opportunities for precise genetic manipulation. However, off-target effects remain a significant challenge, potentially leading to unintended consequences and limiting the applicability of CRISPR-based genome editing technologies in clinical settings. Current literature predominantly focuses on point predictions for off-target activity, which may not fully capture the range of possible outcomes and associated risks. Here, we present crispAI, a neural network architecture-based approach for predicting uncertainty estimates for off-target cleavage activity, providing a more comprehensive risk assessment and facilitating improved decision-making in single guide RNA (sgRNA) design. Our approach makes use of the count noise model Zero Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) to model the uncertainty in the off-target cleavage activity data. In addition, we present the first-of-its-kind genome-wide sgRNA efficiency score, crispAI-aggregate, enabling prioritization among sgRNAs with similar point aggregate predictions by providing richer information compared to existing aggregate scores. We show that uncertainty estimates of our approach are calibrated and its predictive performance is superior to the state-of-the-art in silico off-target cleavage activity prediction methods. The tool and the trained models are available at https://github.com/furkanozdenn/crispr-offtarget-uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae759
Citations
13
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to quantify uncertainty in off-target activity for CRISPR guide RNAs

Furkan Özden, Péter Mináry
13 citations
Nucleic Acids Research
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
3.04
article

Learning to quantify uncertainty in off-target activity for CRISPR guide RNAs

Furkan Özden, Péter Mináry
article en
13 citations

Abstract

CRISPR-based genome editing technologies have revolutionised the field of molecular biology, offering unprecedented opportunities for precise genetic manipulation. However, off-target effects remain a significant challenge, potentially leading to unintended consequences and limiting the applicability of CRISPR-based genome editing technologies in clinical settings. Current literature predominantly focuses on point predictions for off-target activity, which may not fully capture the range of possible outcomes and associated risks. Here, we present crispAI, a neural network architecture-based approach for predicting uncertainty estimates for off-target cleavage activity, providing a more comprehensive risk assessment and facilitating improved decision-making in single guide RNA (sgRNA) design. Our approach makes use of the count noise model Zero Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) to model the uncertainty in the off-target cleavage activity data. In addition, we present the first-of-its-kind genome-wide sgRNA efficiency score, crispAI-aggregate, enabling prioritization among sgRNAs with similar point aggregate predictions by providing richer information compared to existing aggregate scores. We show that uncertainty estimates of our approach are calibrated and its predictive performance is superior to the state-of-the-art in silico off-target cleavage activity prediction methods. The tool and the trained models are available at https://github.com/furkanozdenn/crispr-offtarget-uncertainty.

Nucleic Acids ResearchVol. 52(18)
University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB)
Google, DeepMind
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.