Public health communication during the COVID-19 health crisis: sustainable pathways to improve health information access and reach among underserved communities

This study aims to explore the perspectives of community leaders (CL) on trusted sources of health information, examine their roles, challenges, and needs in disseminating COVID-19 health information, and identify opportunities to improve public health reach and access for underserved communities. This qualitative study included seven focus groups conducted via online video conferencing from April-June 2021. The participants (n = 9) were CL recruited from the Texas Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) for their experience working with underserved communities in Dallas, Texas. Data were coded deductively and analyzed thematically. The analysis resulted in three themes: (1) Information fatigue, mistrust, and desensitization were experienced by community members and leaders; (2) CL were expected to process, verify, and share accurate and timely COVID-19 health information; (3) CL identified potential strategies to improve COVID-19 health info access and reach. CLs were critical in addressing mis/disinformation and fostering trust in public health communication, particularly in underserved communities. They acted as vital intermediaries for health information, striving to debunk mis/disinformation and disseminate accurate health information. Public health strategies could benefit from prioritizing the integration of CL in communicating health information during crises and rebuilding trust within historically and racially marginalized and underserved communities. Supporting CLs, for example, through resources and training programs to counter misinformation and provide access to culturally and linguistically tailored health resources, may significantly enhance the access and reach of evidence-based health communication during health crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03718-7
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public health communication during the COVID-19 health crisis: sustainable pathways to improve health information access and reach among underserved communities

Jacob Szeszulski, Alexandra L. MacMillan Uribe, Phrashiah Githinji, Laura Rolke et al.
9 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
article

Public health communication during the COVID-19 health crisis: sustainable pathways to improve health information access and reach among underserved communities

Jacob Szeszulski, Alexandra L. MacMillan Uribe, Phrashiah Githinji, Laura Rolke, Vi Luong, Chad D. Rethorst, Rebecca A. Seguin‐Fowler, Lucy Xin, Miquela G. Smith
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study aims to explore the perspectives of community leaders (CL) on trusted sources of health information, examine their roles, challenges, and needs in disseminating COVID-19 health information, and identify opportunities to improve public health reach and access for underserved communities. This qualitative study included seven focus groups conducted via online video conferencing from April-June 2021. The participants (n = 9) were CL recruited from the Texas Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) for their experience working with underserved communities in Dallas, Texas. Data were coded deductively and analyzed thematically. The analysis resulted in three themes: (1) Information fatigue, mistrust, and desensitization were experienced by community members and leaders; (2) CL were expected to process, verify, and share accurate and timely COVID-19 health information; (3) CL identified potential strategies to improve COVID-19 health info access and reach. CLs were critical in addressing mis/disinformation and fostering trust in public health communication, particularly in underserved communities. They acted as vital intermediaries for health information, striving to debunk mis/disinformation and disseminate accurate health information. Public health strategies could benefit from prioritizing the integration of CL in communicating health information during crises and rebuilding trust within historically and racially marginalized and underserved communities. Supporting CLs, for example, through resources and training programs to counter misinformation and provide access to culturally and linguistically tailored health resources, may significantly enhance the access and reach of evidence-based health communication during health crises.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Duke University (US), Texas A&M University System (US), University of Utah (US), Center for Advancing Health (US)
University of North Texas, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
10.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.