What’s Your Vocation? A Meta-Analysis of Interventions Tackling Youth Educational and Professional Identity

Choices related to educational and professional identity are critical in defining how adolescents and emerging adults find an area of study and a future occupation that may fit their interests, talents, and aspirations. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively identify psychosocial interventions promoting youth educational and professional identity and critically appraise their effectiveness. Studies could be published in any language and year, and both journal articles and gray literature were considered. Multiple search strategies were applied to identify eligible studies. A total of 17 studies, comprising 3,617 participants (ninterventions = 1,049; ncontrol = 2,568), were included in the meta-analysis. Results highlighted that interventions were effective, with medium effect sizes, for both educational (Cohen’s d = 0.56 [0.35; 0.77], p <.001) and professional (first follow-up: d = 0.51 [0.38; 0.64], p <.001; last follow-up: d = 0.63 [0.42; 0.84], p <.001) identity. To tackle for whom and under which conditions interventions were more effective, moderating analyses were performed. However, moderating factors related to the characteristics of the samples (e.g. gender composition, mean age of participants) and the interventions (e.g. duration, time-lag between baseline and first follow-up) were found to be non-significant. Guidelines for future intervention research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Identity
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2394861
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s Your Vocation? A Meta-Analysis of Interventions Tackling Youth Educational and Professional Identity

Beatrice Bobba, Francesca De Lise, Fabio Maratia, Elisabetta Crocetti et al.
6 citations
Identity
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
6.79
article

What’s Your Vocation? A Meta-Analysis of Interventions Tackling Youth Educational and Professional Identity

Beatrice Bobba, Francesca De Lise, Fabio Maratia, Elisabetta Crocetti, Wim Meeus, Maria Pagano, Valeria Bacaro
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Choices related to educational and professional identity are critical in defining how adolescents and emerging adults find an area of study and a future occupation that may fit their interests, talents, and aspirations. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively identify psychosocial interventions promoting youth educational and professional identity and critically appraise their effectiveness. Studies could be published in any language and year, and both journal articles and gray literature were considered. Multiple search strategies were applied to identify eligible studies. A total of 17 studies, comprising 3,617 participants (ninterventions = 1,049; ncontrol = 2,568), were included in the meta-analysis. Results highlighted that interventions were effective, with medium effect sizes, for both educational (Cohen’s d = 0.56 [0.35; 0.77], p <.001) and professional (first follow-up: d = 0.51 [0.38; 0.64], p <.001; last follow-up: d = 0.63 [0.42; 0.84], p <.001) identity. To tackle for whom and under which conditions interventions were more effective, moderating analyses were performed. However, moderating factors related to the characteristics of the samples (e.g. gender composition, mean age of participants) and the interventions (e.g. duration, time-lag between baseline and first follow-up) were found to be non-significant. Guidelines for future intervention research are discussed.

IdentityVol. 25(2)
Utrecht University (NL), Netherlands Youth Institute (NL), University of Bologna (IT)
European Research Council, Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.