Abstract B011: Predictors of survival and cachexia in pancreatic cancer: results from the CAMPP study

Abstract Introduction: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer-related death in the US and has an overall 5-year survival rate of only 13%. Cachexia, or cancer associated muscle wasting, is common and negatively affects treatment outcomes and quality of life. Despite these poor outcomes, our understanding of PDAC disease processes and improvements in treatments are limited. Here, we present the first results of the Cancer Associations in MUSC PDAC Patients (CAMPP) study. Methods: This retrospective analysis of 133 surgically resectable PDAC patients at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between May 2016 to 2021 includes chart review data on survival, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Cancer cachexia was evaluated via total psoas area at the L3 vertebral level, which was standardized by height to produce a Total Psoas Index (TPI). Survival was plotted via unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis and TPI and cachexic status was examined for 124 patients with both linear and logistic regressions for unadjusted and adjusted data. Results: When analyzing population survival, we observed a mean overall survival (OS) of 23.6 months and mean progression free survival (PFS) of 17.3 months. Notable survival differences include perioperative vs adjuvant only chemotherapy groups in OS at 2 years (p=0.069) and 5 years (p=0.13). Within the perioperative population, there were differences in PFS (p=0.017) and OS (p=0.056) for patients who responded to therapy at 5 years. To explore potential relationships with cachexia, we performed simple bivariate linear regressions for TPI at diagnosis. We found preliminary associations with sex (p<0.001) and creatinine (p=0.062). When adjusting the model for the confounding effects of race, resection status, and perioperative status, sex (p<0.001) and age (p=0.02) were significantly associated. Importantly, creatinine was not significantly associated (p=0.16). Regardless, an adjusted logistic regression using sex-dependent cachexia cutoffs revealed a clinically relevant odds ratio of 0.9 (95% CI [0.72, 1.09]). This indicates a 10% reduction in the odds of cachexia with every 0.1 mg/dL increase in creatinine, all else held constant. Stratifying with sex-dependent cutoffs for both TPI and creatinine revealed significant differences in 5-year OS (p=0.1) between all four groups. Conclusions: Observing survival trends for patients receiving perioperative care is notable as there are currently no clear guidelines for perioperative chemotherapy despite growing evidence for its efficacy. Further, while sex and age are known predictors of cachexia, creatinine is much less studied. Our associations between creatinine and TPI agree with observations in lung cancer, supporting its use as a clinically relevant marker. Ongoing work is exploring longitudinal measures of cachexia and correlating the CAMPP dataset with tumor genomics to reveal individualized factors impacting patient outcomes. Citation Format: Julie A Disharoon, Arash Velayati, Chloe Matila, Andrew Disharoon, Joseph A Karam, John Redhead, Rachel Burge, Elizabeth G Hill, David T Long, Toros A Dincman. Predictors of survival and cachexia in pancreatic cancer: results from the CAMPP study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B011.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.pancreatic24-b011
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract B011: Predictors of survival and cachexia in pancreatic cancer: results from the CAMPP study

Elizabeth G. Hill, David T. Long, Toros Dincman, Rachel A. Burge et al.
Cancer Research
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Abstract B011: Predictors of survival and cachexia in pancreatic cancer: results from the CAMPP study

Elizabeth G. Hill, David T. Long, Toros Dincman, Rachel A. Burge, Joseph Karam, Arash Velayati, Julie A. Disharoon, Chloe Matila, Andrew Disharoon, J. B. Redhead
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer-related death in the US and has an overall 5-year survival rate of only 13%. Cachexia, or cancer associated muscle wasting, is common and negatively affects treatment outcomes and quality of life. Despite these poor outcomes, our understanding of PDAC disease processes and improvements in treatments are limited. Here, we present the first results of the Cancer Associations in MUSC PDAC Patients (CAMPP) study. Methods: This retrospective analysis of 133 surgically resectable PDAC patients at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between May 2016 to 2021 includes chart review data on survival, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Cancer cachexia was evaluated via total psoas area at the L3 vertebral level, which was standardized by height to produce a Total Psoas Index (TPI). Survival was plotted via unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis and TPI and cachexic status was examined for 124 patients with both linear and logistic regressions for unadjusted and adjusted data. Results: When analyzing population survival, we observed a mean overall survival (OS) of 23.6 months and mean progression free survival (PFS) of 17.3 months. Notable survival differences include perioperative vs adjuvant only chemotherapy groups in OS at 2 years (p=0.069) and 5 years (p=0.13). Within the perioperative population, there were differences in PFS (p=0.017) and OS (p=0.056) for patients who responded to therapy at 5 years. To explore potential relationships with cachexia, we performed simple bivariate linear regressions for TPI at diagnosis. We found preliminary associations with sex (p<0.001) and creatinine (p=0.062). When adjusting the model for the confounding effects of race, resection status, and perioperative status, sex (p<0.001) and age (p=0.02) were significantly associated. Importantly, creatinine was not significantly associated (p=0.16). Regardless, an adjusted logistic regression using sex-dependent cachexia cutoffs revealed a clinically relevant odds ratio of 0.9 (95% CI [0.72, 1.09]). This indicates a 10% reduction in the odds of cachexia with every 0.1 mg/dL increase in creatinine, all else held constant. Stratifying with sex-dependent cutoffs for both TPI and creatinine revealed significant differences in 5-year OS (p=0.1) between all four groups. Conclusions: Observing survival trends for patients receiving perioperative care is notable as there are currently no clear guidelines for perioperative chemotherapy despite growing evidence for its efficacy. Further, while sex and age are known predictors of cachexia, creatinine is much less studied. Our associations between creatinine and TPI agree with observations in lung cancer, supporting its use as a clinically relevant marker. Ongoing work is exploring longitudinal measures of cachexia and correlating the CAMPP dataset with tumor genomics to reveal individualized factors impacting patient outcomes. Citation Format: Julie A Disharoon, Arash Velayati, Chloe Matila, Andrew Disharoon, Joseph A Karam, John Redhead, Rachel Burge, Elizabeth G Hill, David T Long, Toros A Dincman. Predictors of survival and cachexia in pancreatic cancer: results from the CAMPP study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B011.

Cancer ResearchVol. 84(17_Supplement_2)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), MUSC Hollings Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.