Predicting Reactivity and Passivation of Solid-State Battery Interfaces

In this work, we build a computationally inexpensive, data-driven model that utilizes atomistic structure information to predict the reactivity of interfaces between any candidate solid-state electrolyte material and a Li metal anode. This model is trained on data from <i>ab initio</i> molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the time evolution of the solid electrolyte-Li metal interfaces for 67 different materials. Predicting the reactivity of solid-state interfaces with <i>ab initio</i> techniques remains an elusive challenge in materials discovery and informatics, and previous work on predicting interfacial compatibility of solid-state Li-ion electrolytes and Li metal anodes has focused mainly on thermodynamic convex hull calculations. Our framework involves training machine learning models on AIMD data, thereby capturing information on both kinetics and thermodynamics, and then leveraging these models to predict the reactivity of thousands of new candidates in the span of seconds, avoiding the need for additional weeks-long AIMD simulations. We identify over 300 new chemically stable and over 780 passivating solid electrolytes that are predicted to be thermodynamically unfavored. Our results indicate many potential solid-state electrolyte candidates have been incorrectly labeled unstable via purely thermodynamic approaches using density functional theory (DFT) energetics, and that the pool of promising, Li-stable solid-state electrolyte materials may be much larger than previously thought from screening efforts. To showcase the value of our approach, we highlight two borate materials that were identified by our model and confirmed by further AIMD calculations to likely be highly conductive and chemically stable with Li: LiB<sub>13</sub>C<sub>2</sub> and LiB<sub>12</sub>PC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c06095
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Reactivity and Passivation of Solid-State Battery Interfaces

Brandi Ransom, Daniel Jost, Akash Ramdas, Eder G. Lomeli et al.
10 citations
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.17
article

Predicting Reactivity and Passivation of Solid-State Battery Interfaces

Brandi Ransom, Daniel Jost, Akash Ramdas, Eder G. Lomeli, Thomas Devereaux, Evan J. Reed, Austin D. Sendek, Brian Moritz
article en
10 citations

Abstract

In this work, we build a computationally inexpensive, data-driven model that utilizes atomistic structure information to predict the reactivity of interfaces between any candidate solid-state electrolyte material and a Li metal anode. This model is trained on data from <i>ab initio</i> molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the time evolution of the solid electrolyte-Li metal interfaces for 67 different materials. Predicting the reactivity of solid-state interfaces with <i>ab initio</i> techniques remains an elusive challenge in materials discovery and informatics, and previous work on predicting interfacial compatibility of solid-state Li-ion electrolytes and Li metal anodes has focused mainly on thermodynamic convex hull calculations. Our framework involves training machine learning models on AIMD data, thereby capturing information on both kinetics and thermodynamics, and then leveraging these models to predict the reactivity of thousands of new candidates in the span of seconds, avoiding the need for additional weeks-long AIMD simulations. We identify over 300 new chemically stable and over 780 passivating solid electrolytes that are predicted to be thermodynamically unfavored. Our results indicate many potential solid-state electrolyte candidates have been incorrectly labeled unstable via purely thermodynamic approaches using density functional theory (DFT) energetics, and that the pool of promising, Li-stable solid-state electrolyte materials may be much larger than previously thought from screening efforts. To showcase the value of our approach, we highlight two borate materials that were identified by our model and confirmed by further AIMD calculations to likely be highly conductive and chemically stable with Li: LiB<sub>13</sub>C<sub>2</sub> and LiB<sub>12</sub>PC.

ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesVol. 16(38)
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.