Human vs ChatGPT. È possibile ottenere risultati paragonabili nell’analisi di scientific systematic review?
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, showed significant potential in revolutionizing the production of scientific literature by supporting healthcare professionals. Although there are challenges that require careful evaluation, ChatGPT's results are comparable to human results. The key element is not so much the superiority of AI over humans but the human ability to configure and direct AI for optimal or even potentially superior human results.
Authors
- Paolo Di Procolo
- Daniele Di Ianni
- Giulia Dell’Omo
- Chiara Esposito
Institutions
- Roche (Italy) (IT)
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Recenti Progressi in Medicina
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1701/4334.43184
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.36