Counting everyone: evidence for inclusive measures of disability in federal surveys

The US Census Bureau has used the American Community Survey six-question set (ACS-6) to identify disabled people since 2008. In late 2023, the Census Bureau proposed changes to these questions that would have reduced disability prevalence estimates by 42%. Because these estimates inform funding and programs that support the health and independence of people with disabilities, many disability researchers and advocates feared this change in data collection would lead to reductions in funding and services. While the Census has paused-but not ruled out-the proposed changes, it is critical that alternate, more inclusive disability questions be identified and tested. We used data from the 2023/2024 National Survey on Health and Disability to explore alternative questions to identify disabled people in national surveys. A single broad question about conditions identified 11.2% more people with disabilities, and missed significantly fewer people with psychiatric disabilities compared to the current ACS-6 questions. A combination of a broad question and the existing ACS-6 questions may be necessary to more accurately and inclusively identify people with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae106
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting everyone: evidence for inclusive measures of disability in federal surveys

Andrew Myers, Noelle K. Kurth, Jean P. Hall, Kelsey S. Goddard et al.
6 citations
Health Affairs Scholar
Health disparities and outcomes
3.17
article

Counting everyone: evidence for inclusive measures of disability in federal surveys

Andrew Myers, Noelle K. Kurth, Jean P. Hall, Kelsey S. Goddard, Catherine Ipsen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The US Census Bureau has used the American Community Survey six-question set (ACS-6) to identify disabled people since 2008. In late 2023, the Census Bureau proposed changes to these questions that would have reduced disability prevalence estimates by 42%. Because these estimates inform funding and programs that support the health and independence of people with disabilities, many disability researchers and advocates feared this change in data collection would lead to reductions in funding and services. While the Census has paused-but not ruled out-the proposed changes, it is critical that alternate, more inclusive disability questions be identified and tested. We used data from the 2023/2024 National Survey on Health and Disability to explore alternative questions to identify disabled people in national surveys. A single broad question about conditions identified 11.2% more people with disabilities, and missed significantly fewer people with psychiatric disabilities compared to the current ACS-6 questions. A combination of a broad question and the existing ACS-6 questions may be necessary to more accurately and inclusively identify people with disabilities.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 2(9)
University of Kansas (US), University of Montana (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hamilton Health Sciences, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
3.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Counting everyone: evidence for inclusive measures of disability in federal surveys — Andrew Myers, Noelle K. Kurth, et al. · Health Affairs Scholar (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS