Rental housing and the continuum of carcerality

Existing research on housing and the carceral state demonstrates a divergence in the carceral state's orientation toward property owners and the unhoused. We focus on the liminal arena of rental housing and draw on three cases—landlords’ use of criminal history to screen rental applicants, citizen participation in policing neighborhoods, and crime initiatives that weaponize building code enforcement—to posit a continuum of housing carcerality. We argue that the carceral regulation of rental housing emerges from sources in civil law and policy, illustrating the enduring relevance of what Beckett and Murakawa call the shadow carceral state. Yet, in the rental context, the carceral state tends to have a more covert, decentralized character which does not consistently align with the economic interests of rental property owners and other housing market elites in comparison to its manifestation at the ends of the continuum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical Criminology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806241278341
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rental housing and the continuum of carcerality

Anna Reosti, Robin Bartram, Rahim Kurwa
16 citations
Theoretical Criminology
Homelessness and Social Issues
13.59
article

Rental housing and the continuum of carcerality

Anna Reosti, Robin Bartram, Rahim Kurwa
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Existing research on housing and the carceral state demonstrates a divergence in the carceral state's orientation toward property owners and the unhoused. We focus on the liminal arena of rental housing and draw on three cases—landlords’ use of criminal history to screen rental applicants, citizen participation in policing neighborhoods, and crime initiatives that weaponize building code enforcement—to posit a continuum of housing carcerality. We argue that the carceral regulation of rental housing emerges from sources in civil law and policy, illustrating the enduring relevance of what Beckett and Murakawa call the shadow carceral state. Yet, in the rental context, the carceral state tends to have a more covert, decentralized character which does not consistently align with the economic interests of rental property owners and other housing market elites in comparison to its manifestation at the ends of the continuum.

Theoretical CriminologyVol. 28(4)
American Bar Foundation (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Homelessness and Social Issues
13.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rental housing and the continuum of carcerality — Anna Reosti, Robin Bartram, et al. · Theoretical Criminology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS