Improving the evaluation mechanism and enhancing the quality and efficiency of project review—from the perspective of the pilot work of the “responsibility, credibility, contribution” evaluation mechanism in the Departme

<p indent="0mm">Scientificity is the bedrock of National Natural Science Fund, while fairness is its lifeblood. The scientific, fair and impartial completion of project review is a critical element in improving funding efficiency, fostering technological innovation, and advancing the upgrade of scientific system. This article introduces the pilot work of the “Responsibility, Credibility, Contribution” (RCC) evaluation mechanism in the Department of Chemical Sciences at NSFC from 2021 to 2023. It encompasses statistical analysis on data related to “responsibility” and “credibility” indicators, summarizes interim achievements and pilot experiences, and offers policy recommendations and implementation measures for future endeavors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Sinica Chimica
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1360/ssc-2024-0079
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the evaluation mechanism and enhancing the quality and efficiency of project review&mdash;from the perspective of the pilot work of the &ldquo;responsibility, credibility, contribution&rdquo; evaluation mechanism in the Departme

D.M.R. Rao, Ling Wang, Junlin Yang, Yan Huang et al.
Scientia Sinica Chimica
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
article

Improving the evaluation mechanism and enhancing the quality and efficiency of project review&mdash;from the perspective of the pilot work of the &ldquo;responsibility, credibility, contribution&rdquo; evaluation mechanism in the Departme

D.M.R. Rao, Ling Wang, Junlin Yang, Yan Huang, Shige Zhan
article en

Abstract

<p indent="0mm">Scientificity is the bedrock of National Natural Science Fund, while fairness is its lifeblood. The scientific, fair and impartial completion of project review is a critical element in improving funding efficiency, fostering technological innovation, and advancing the upgrade of scientific system. This article introduces the pilot work of the “Responsibility, Credibility, Contribution” (RCC) evaluation mechanism in the Department of Chemical Sciences at NSFC from 2021 to 2023. It encompasses statistical analysis on data related to “responsibility” and “credibility” indicators, summarizes interim achievements and pilot experiences, and offers policy recommendations and implementation measures for future endeavors.

Scientia Sinica ChimicaVol. 54(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving the evaluation mechanism and enhancing the quality and efficiency of project review&amp;mdash;from the perspective of the pilot work of the &amp;ldquo;responsibility, credibility, contribution&amp;rdquo; evaluation mechanism in the Departme — D.M.R. Rao, Ling Wang, et al. · Scientia Sinica Chimica (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS