Geopolitical Implications of Educational Diplomacy: The Fulbright Program, 1958–2023

This article combines archival research and critical discourse analysis to examine 33 evaluation and report documents that evaluate the effectiveness of the Fulbright Program from 1958–2023. Specifically, the study employs argumentation analysis to understand the underlying ideological strategies used to discursively construct the Fulbright Program's multiple purposes. The study finds that the documents argue that education and mutual understanding are ephemeral concepts, the Fulbright Program has geopolitical justifications, and academic disciplines are a source of geopolitical power. This approach to analyzing the Fulbright Program's historical documents provides a model for understanding educational diplomacy schemes that use higher education as a geopolitical tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Studies in International Education
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153241275039
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical Implications of Educational Diplomacy: The Fulbright Program, 1958–2023

Marisa Lally
5 citations
Journal of Studies in International Education
Global Education and Multiculturalism
10.48
article

Geopolitical Implications of Educational Diplomacy: The Fulbright Program, 1958–2023

Marisa Lally
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article combines archival research and critical discourse analysis to examine 33 evaluation and report documents that evaluate the effectiveness of the Fulbright Program from 1958–2023. Specifically, the study employs argumentation analysis to understand the underlying ideological strategies used to discursively construct the Fulbright Program's multiple purposes. The study finds that the documents argue that education and mutual understanding are ephemeral concepts, the Fulbright Program has geopolitical justifications, and academic disciplines are a source of geopolitical power. This approach to analyzing the Fulbright Program's historical documents provides a model for understanding educational diplomacy schemes that use higher education as a geopolitical tool.

Journal of Studies in International EducationVol. 28(5)
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
10.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geopolitical Implications of Educational Diplomacy: The Fulbright Program, 1958–2023 — Marisa Lally · Journal of Studies in International Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS