Assessing the true value of ecological restoration in mining areas: An input-output approach based on ecosystem service valuation

• Establish a comprehensive evaluation framework for mine ecological restoration. • Use the value added of land assets around the restoration area to assess the social value. • The indirect value of ecological restoration is 3.12 times that of direct value. • Economic-only input–output ratio is 0.34, comprehensive benefit ratio is 1.40. Historical unsustainable mining activities have led to significant ecological degradation, emphasizing the importance and urgency of ecological restoration and its effectiveness assessment. This study evaluates the economic, ecological, and social benefits of ecological restoration in the Longshan mining area from the perspective of ecological product value, utilizing an input–output research framework based on ecosystem service valuation. This comprehensive assessment includes consideration of restoration cost inputs, aiming to delve into the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects in mining areas. The findings reveal: (1) The indirect value of the ecological products generated by the ecological restoration is approximately 3.13 times greater than their direct value, highlighting the significantly positive impacts of the project. This underscores the necessity for future assessments of mining area ecological restoration projects to not only focus on direct economic returns but also to thoroughly examine their long-term positive impacts on social structures, environmental quality, and residents’ quality of life. (2) When considered solely from an economic benefit perspective, the input–output ratio of the project is 0.34, insufficient to cover the total cost of the project. However, after integrating economic, ecological, and social benefits, the input–output ratio increases to 1.40. This indicates the importance of exploring the mechanisms through which the indirect values of ecological and social benefits contribute directly to the project’s economic sustainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112591
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the true value of ecological restoration in mining areas: An input-output approach based on ecosystem service valuation

Feifei Gao, Hong-Dian Jiang, Wei Yang, Jinsheng Zhou et al.
15 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.24
article

Assessing the true value of ecological restoration in mining areas: An input-output approach based on ecosystem service valuation

Feifei Gao, Hong-Dian Jiang, Wei Yang, Jinsheng Zhou, Guoyu Wang
article en
15 citations

Abstract

• Establish a comprehensive evaluation framework for mine ecological restoration. • Use the value added of land assets around the restoration area to assess the social value. • The indirect value of ecological restoration is 3.12 times that of direct value. • Economic-only input–output ratio is 0.34, comprehensive benefit ratio is 1.40. Historical unsustainable mining activities have led to significant ecological degradation, emphasizing the importance and urgency of ecological restoration and its effectiveness assessment. This study evaluates the economic, ecological, and social benefits of ecological restoration in the Longshan mining area from the perspective of ecological product value, utilizing an input–output research framework based on ecosystem service valuation. This comprehensive assessment includes consideration of restoration cost inputs, aiming to delve into the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects in mining areas. The findings reveal: (1) The indirect value of the ecological products generated by the ecological restoration is approximately 3.13 times greater than their direct value, highlighting the significantly positive impacts of the project. This underscores the necessity for future assessments of mining area ecological restoration projects to not only focus on direct economic returns but also to thoroughly examine their long-term positive impacts on social structures, environmental quality, and residents’ quality of life. (2) When considered solely from an economic benefit perspective, the input–output ratio of the project is 0.34, insufficient to cover the total cost of the project. However, after integrating economic, ecological, and social benefits, the input–output ratio increases to 1.40. This indicates the importance of exploring the mechanisms through which the indirect values of ecological and social benefits contribute directly to the project’s economic sustainability.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 166
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.