Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites?

Prior research has suggested that negative online reviews may have greater effect to the receiver of word-of-mouth communication than similar positive online reviews. This research investigates the impact negative online reviews may have when consumers post them on different types of websites. Specifically, boundary conditions such as review types and review characteristics were considered as they interacted with website types to affect reviewer source credibility, specifically, reviewer expertise, trustworthiness, and ultimately, information usefulness. Study 1 results demonstrated that negative informative online reviews influence consumer’s perceptions of reviewer expertise on a knowledge-centric website compared to that on a social-centric website. However, this effect did not operate for negative online recommender reviews. Readers on knowledge-centric websites may want information to make decisions about reviewer expertise to determine whether a review was trustworthy and therefore, useful. Study 2 results demonstrated that high review reads had similar impact on both social-centric and knowledge-centric websites in terms of perceived reviewer expertise. However, when reviews had low reads, individuals on knowledge-centric websites may ignore such cues. Theoretical and managerial implications were discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Marketing Studies
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v16n2p11
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites?

Mousumi Bose
International Journal of Marketing Studies
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites?

Mousumi Bose
article en

Abstract

Prior research has suggested that negative online reviews may have greater effect to the receiver of word-of-mouth communication than similar positive online reviews. This research investigates the impact negative online reviews may have when consumers post them on different types of websites. Specifically, boundary conditions such as review types and review characteristics were considered as they interacted with website types to affect reviewer source credibility, specifically, reviewer expertise, trustworthiness, and ultimately, information usefulness. Study 1 results demonstrated that negative informative online reviews influence consumer’s perceptions of reviewer expertise on a knowledge-centric website compared to that on a social-centric website. However, this effect did not operate for negative online recommender reviews. Readers on knowledge-centric websites may want information to make decisions about reviewer expertise to determine whether a review was trustworthy and therefore, useful. Study 2 results demonstrated that high review reads had similar impact on both social-centric and knowledge-centric websites in terms of perceived reviewer expertise. However, when reviews had low reads, individuals on knowledge-centric websites may ignore such cues. Theoretical and managerial implications were discussed.

International Journal of Marketing StudiesVol. 16(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Negative Online Reviews Be Perceived Differently on Different Websites? — Mousumi Bose · International Journal of Marketing Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS