Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods

The best empirical research in political science clearly defines substantive parameters of interest, presents a set of assumptions that guarantees their identification, and uses an appropriate estimator. We argue for the importance of explicitly integrating rigorous theory into this process and focus on the advantages of doing so. By integrating a theoretical structure into one’s empirical strategy, researchers can quantify the effects of competing mechanisms, consider the ex-ante effects of new policies, extrapolate findings to new environments, estimate model-specific theoretical parameters, evaluate the fit of a theoretical model, and test competing models that aim to explain the same phenomena. As a guide to such a methodology, we provide an overview of structural estimation, including formal definitions, implementation suggestions, examples, and comparisons to other methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Theoretical Politics
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298241281059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods

Nathan Canen, Kristopher W. Ramsay
1 citations
Journal of Theoretical Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
article

Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods

Nathan Canen, Kristopher W. Ramsay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The best empirical research in political science clearly defines substantive parameters of interest, presents a set of assumptions that guarantees their identification, and uses an appropriate estimator. We argue for the importance of explicitly integrating rigorous theory into this process and focus on the advantages of doing so. By integrating a theoretical structure into one’s empirical strategy, researchers can quantify the effects of competing mechanisms, consider the ex-ante effects of new policies, extrapolate findings to new environments, estimate model-specific theoretical parameters, evaluate the fit of a theoretical model, and test competing models that aim to explain the same phenomena. As a guide to such a methodology, we provide an overview of structural estimation, including formal definitions, implementation suggestions, examples, and comparisons to other methods.

Journal of Theoretical PoliticsVol. 36(4)
Princeton University (US), University of Warwick (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods — Nathan Canen, Kristopher W. Ramsay · Journal of Theoretical Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS