B - 75 The Relationship between BRIEF-A Composite Scores with Anxiety and Depression

Abstract Objective Recent studies have suggested the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) might be measuring emotional distress as opposed to objective executive functioning. The current study explored the relationship between emotional distress on the BRIEF-A - specifically anxiety and depression. Data Selection 90 participants (75.6% Caucasian, 10.0% Hispanic, 5.6% Asian, 2.2% African-American, 2.2% Middle Eastern, 4.4% Unspecified) assessed at a Midwest clinic were selected based on the presence of relevant scores from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and BRIEF-A. Data Synthesis Archival data were analyzed using regression analyses, with each predictor (MMPI-2 clinical scales 2 and 7) entered as predictors of BRIEF BRI and MI composite indices. The full model accounted for 31.5% (p < 0.001) of the variance in BRI. Scale 7 accounted for 30.1% (p < 0.001) of variability in the BRI. Scale 2 was not a significant predictor of BRI and only accounted for an additional 2% of the variability. With regard to MI, the full model accounted for 33.3% (p < 0.001) of the variability in MI. Scale 7 accounted for 27.0% (p < 0.01) of the variability in MI, and Scale 2 contributed an additional 6.3% (P.005) of predictive capacity. Conclusions The current analysis identified that emotional distress was a significant predictor of BRIEF-A MI and BRI composite scores, accounting for 31.5% and 33.3% of the variability, respectively. This suggests that these BRIEF-A composite scores are notably correlated with emotional distress. Within this, anxiety was a more potent predictor than depression.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.236
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B - 75 The Relationship between BRIEF-A Composite Scores with Anxiety and Depression

Tyler Brandys, Lisa Naatz, Benjamin Pyykkonen, George W Kent et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Health and Well-being Studies
article

B - 75 The Relationship between BRIEF-A Composite Scores with Anxiety and Depression

Tyler Brandys, Lisa Naatz, Benjamin Pyykkonen, George W Kent, Emilie Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Recent studies have suggested the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) might be measuring emotional distress as opposed to objective executive functioning. The current study explored the relationship between emotional distress on the BRIEF-A - specifically anxiety and depression. Data Selection 90 participants (75.6% Caucasian, 10.0% Hispanic, 5.6% Asian, 2.2% African-American, 2.2% Middle Eastern, 4.4% Unspecified) assessed at a Midwest clinic were selected based on the presence of relevant scores from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and BRIEF-A. Data Synthesis Archival data were analyzed using regression analyses, with each predictor (MMPI-2 clinical scales 2 and 7) entered as predictors of BRIEF BRI and MI composite indices. The full model accounted for 31.5% (p < 0.001) of the variance in BRI. Scale 7 accounted for 30.1% (p < 0.001) of variability in the BRI. Scale 2 was not a significant predictor of BRI and only accounted for an additional 2% of the variability. With regard to MI, the full model accounted for 33.3% (p < 0.001) of the variability in MI. Scale 7 accounted for 27.0% (p < 0.01) of the variability in MI, and Scale 2 contributed an additional 6.3% (P.005) of predictive capacity. Conclusions The current analysis identified that emotional distress was a significant predictor of BRIEF-A MI and BRI composite scores, accounting for 31.5% and 33.3% of the variability, respectively. This suggests that these BRIEF-A composite scores are notably correlated with emotional distress. Within this, anxiety was a more potent predictor than depression.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.