A - 31 The Interaction of Cognitive Reserve and Multi-Modal Cognitive Training on the Cognitive Functioning of Older Adults at Risk for Dementia

Abstract Objective Multi-modal cognitive training improves cognition among those at risk for dementia. Although the mechanism is likely via improved cognitive flexibility, conceptually central cognitive reserve, it remains unclear whether cognitive reserve moderates cognitive training effects. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline cognitive reserve moderates cognitive improvement following cognitive training. Methods Forty-one older adults (M = 72.7+/−4.9 years, 65.1% female, 17% non-white) with self-reported memory loss and baseline TICS score of 24–37 participated in a 6-month cognitive training intervention consisting of weekly computer-administered piano lesson and 30 minutes of daily homework. Cognition was assessed pre and post-intervention using CNS-Vital Signs. Specific domains tested were cognitive flexibility, psychomotor speed, and executive functioning. Cognitive reserve was operationalized as years of education. Results Significant post-training improvements occurred in all three cognitive domains (cognitive flexibility t = −6.34, p < 0.001; psychomotor speed t = −2.62, p = 0.01; executive functioning t = −6.49, p < 0.001). Years of education significantly moderated improvements in executive functioning (b = −0.06, SE(b) = 0.03, t(37) = −2.07, p = 0.045), but neither cognitive flexibility nor psychomotor speed. Specifically, participants with lower education improved most in executive functioning (b = 1.60, t = 2.78, p = 0.008). Conclusions Findings suggest that participants with lower cognitive reserve may benefit more from far-transfer effects of cognitive training on executive functioning. This was not observed in domains closely related (cognitive flexibility) and relatively unrelated (psychomotor speed) to cognitive reserve.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.045
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 31 The Interaction of Cognitive Reserve and Multi-Modal Cognitive Training on the Cognitive Functioning of Older Adults at Risk for Dementia

Jenay M. Beer, Lisa M. Renzi‐Hammond, Kassidy Hogan, Stephen Correia et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

A - 31 The Interaction of Cognitive Reserve and Multi-Modal Cognitive Training on the Cognitive Functioning of Older Adults at Risk for Dementia

Jenay M. Beer, Lisa M. Renzi‐Hammond, Kassidy Hogan, Stephen Correia, Lawrence H. Sweet, Jade Dandurand
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Multi-modal cognitive training improves cognition among those at risk for dementia. Although the mechanism is likely via improved cognitive flexibility, conceptually central cognitive reserve, it remains unclear whether cognitive reserve moderates cognitive training effects. The objective of this study was to determine whether baseline cognitive reserve moderates cognitive improvement following cognitive training. Methods Forty-one older adults (M = 72.7+/−4.9 years, 65.1% female, 17% non-white) with self-reported memory loss and baseline TICS score of 24–37 participated in a 6-month cognitive training intervention consisting of weekly computer-administered piano lesson and 30 minutes of daily homework. Cognition was assessed pre and post-intervention using CNS-Vital Signs. Specific domains tested were cognitive flexibility, psychomotor speed, and executive functioning. Cognitive reserve was operationalized as years of education. Results Significant post-training improvements occurred in all three cognitive domains (cognitive flexibility t = −6.34, p < 0.001; psychomotor speed t = −2.62, p = 0.01; executive functioning t = −6.49, p < 0.001). Years of education significantly moderated improvements in executive functioning (b = −0.06, SE(b) = 0.03, t(37) = −2.07, p = 0.045), but neither cognitive flexibility nor psychomotor speed. Specifically, participants with lower education improved most in executive functioning (b = 1.60, t = 2.78, p = 0.008). Conclusions Findings suggest that participants with lower cognitive reserve may benefit more from far-transfer effects of cognitive training on executive functioning. This was not observed in domains closely related (cognitive flexibility) and relatively unrelated (psychomotor speed) to cognitive reserve.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A - 31 The Interaction of Cognitive Reserve and Multi-Modal Cognitive Training on the Cognitive Functioning of Older Adults at Risk for Dementia — Jenay M. Beer, Lisa M. Renzi‐Hammond, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS