A - 70 Contextualizing Racial/Ethnic Differences in Baseline Assessment among Collegiate Athletes

Abstract Objective Compared to other factors that influence neuropsychological test performance, few studies have examined the relationship between racial/ethnic identity and baseline assessment performance in collegiate athletes, and even fewer have contextualized results using structural factors linked to test performance (e.g., premorbid cognitive ability). This study examined racial/ethnic differences in baseline assessment performance before and after controlling for premorbid functioning. We hypothesized that there would be racial/ethnic differences in performance but that controlling for premorbid functioning would reduce these differences. Method Participants included 875 collegiate athletes who were grouped based on racial/ethnic identity (White = 661, Black = 165, Another Race = 49) and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Cognitive composite scores and intraindividual variability (IIV) were calculated for two neurocognitive domains: attention/processing speed and memory. Premorbid functioning was assessed with the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR). ANCOVAs were used to examine racial/ethnic differences in these four cognitive domains before and after controlling for WTAR scores. Results Before controlling for WTAR scores, there were significant racial/ethnic differences in the attention/processing speed and memory composite scores and in attention/processing speed IIV, p’s < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.02–0.03. However, there were no significant racial/ethnic differences in memory IIV, p = 0.97. After controlling for WTAR scores, there were no significant racial/ethnic differences in the attention/processing (p = 0.530, ηp2 = 0.001) or memory (p = 0.183, ηp2 = 0.004) composite scores, and the relationship between racial/ethnic identity and attention/processing speed IIV became less significant (p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.01). Conclusions Results suggest that racial/ethnic differences at baseline assessment can be largely accounted for by premorbid functioning, which underscores the importance of considering sociocultural context when assessing racially/ethnically diverse athletes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.084
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 70 Contextualizing Racial/Ethnic Differences in Baseline Assessment among Collegiate Athletes

Garrett A Thomas, Megan L Bradson, Peter A. Arnett, McKenna S Sakamoto et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Sports Performance and Training
article

A - 70 Contextualizing Racial/Ethnic Differences in Baseline Assessment among Collegiate Athletes

Garrett A Thomas, Megan L Bradson, Peter A. Arnett, McKenna S Sakamoto, Breanna J Becnel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Compared to other factors that influence neuropsychological test performance, few studies have examined the relationship between racial/ethnic identity and baseline assessment performance in collegiate athletes, and even fewer have contextualized results using structural factors linked to test performance (e.g., premorbid cognitive ability). This study examined racial/ethnic differences in baseline assessment performance before and after controlling for premorbid functioning. We hypothesized that there would be racial/ethnic differences in performance but that controlling for premorbid functioning would reduce these differences. Method Participants included 875 collegiate athletes who were grouped based on racial/ethnic identity (White = 661, Black = 165, Another Race = 49) and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Cognitive composite scores and intraindividual variability (IIV) were calculated for two neurocognitive domains: attention/processing speed and memory. Premorbid functioning was assessed with the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR). ANCOVAs were used to examine racial/ethnic differences in these four cognitive domains before and after controlling for WTAR scores. Results Before controlling for WTAR scores, there were significant racial/ethnic differences in the attention/processing speed and memory composite scores and in attention/processing speed IIV, p’s < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.02–0.03. However, there were no significant racial/ethnic differences in memory IIV, p = 0.97. After controlling for WTAR scores, there were no significant racial/ethnic differences in the attention/processing (p = 0.530, ηp2 = 0.001) or memory (p = 0.183, ηp2 = 0.004) composite scores, and the relationship between racial/ethnic identity and attention/processing speed IIV became less significant (p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.01). Conclusions Results suggest that racial/ethnic differences at baseline assessment can be largely accounted for by premorbid functioning, which underscores the importance of considering sociocultural context when assessing racially/ethnically diverse athletes.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.