Patches, Patchworks, and Epsilon Terms: A Neo-Carnapian Account of Theoretical Terms in Science

Abstract In the last decades, scientific laws and concepts have been increasingly conceptualized as a patchwork of contextual and indeterminate entities. These patchwork constructions are sometimes claimed to be incompatible with traditional views of scientific theories and concepts, but it is difficult to assess such claims due to the informal character of these approaches. In this paper, we will show that patchwork approaches pose a new problem of theoretical terms. Specifically, we will demonstrate how a toy example of a patchwork structure might trivialize Carnap’s semantics for theoretical terms based upon epsilon calculus. However, as we will see, this new problem of theoretical terms can be given a neo-Carnapian solution, by generalizing Carnap’s account of theoretical terms in such a way that it applies also to patchwork constructions. Our neo-Carnapian approach to theoretical terms will also demonstrate that the analytic/synthetic distinction is meaningful even for patchwork structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09774-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patches, Patchworks, and Epsilon Terms: A Neo-Carnapian Account of Theoretical Terms in Science

Elio La Rosa, Matteo De Benedetto
2 citations
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
article

Patches, Patchworks, and Epsilon Terms: A Neo-Carnapian Account of Theoretical Terms in Science

Elio La Rosa, Matteo De Benedetto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the last decades, scientific laws and concepts have been increasingly conceptualized as a patchwork of contextual and indeterminate entities. These patchwork constructions are sometimes claimed to be incompatible with traditional views of scientific theories and concepts, but it is difficult to assess such claims due to the informal character of these approaches. In this paper, we will show that patchwork approaches pose a new problem of theoretical terms. Specifically, we will demonstrate how a toy example of a patchwork structure might trivialize Carnap’s semantics for theoretical terms based upon epsilon calculus. However, as we will see, this new problem of theoretical terms can be given a neo-Carnapian solution, by generalizing Carnap’s account of theoretical terms in such a way that it applies also to patchwork constructions. Our neo-Carnapian approach to theoretical terms will also demonstrate that the analytic/synthetic distinction is meaningful even for patchwork structures.

Journal of Philosophical LogicVol. 53(6)
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Scuola IMT Alti Studi Lucca
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
12.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.