B - 114 Evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score for Predicting Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Clinical Syndrome Progression

Abstract Objective The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) is derived from the MoCA as a supplementary memory measure, with research suggesting the MoCA-MIS can identify those at higher risk of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s Clinical Syndrome (ACS). This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA total score (TS), delayed free recall score (DFRS), and MIS in classifying amnestic MCI (aMCI) to ACS converters and replicated an algorithm recommended by Julayanont et al. (2014). Methods National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center data were examined in individuals with aMCI, ≥50 years of age (Myears = 75.35[7.92]) who had 3–6 annual follow-up visits. Participants (n = 353) were mostly male (58%), White (88%), and well-educated (Myears = 16.37[5.21]). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses utilized baseline MoCA scores to examine optimal cutoffs using Youden’s index. Sensitivity and specificity of Julayanont’s algorithm (TScutoff<20 + MIScutoff<7) were also examined. Results Over follow-up (Myears = 4.52[1.02]), 53.3% converted to ACS. ROC analyses to predict longitudinal conversion from aMCI to ACS revealed similar sensitivity and specificity across MoCA scores (TScutoff<24, AUC = 0.67, Sensitivity = 0.78, Specificity = 0.49; DFRScutoff<2, AUC = 0.67, Sensitivity = 0.75, Specificity = 0.54; MIScutoff<8, AUC = 0.69, Sensitivity = 0.66, Specificity = 0.64). The Julayanont algorithm displayed low sensitivity (0.18) but high specificity (0.93) in this sample. Conclusion In predicting aMCI to ACS conversion over a 3–6 year period, baseline MoCA-TS, DFRS, and MIS cutoffs failed to demonstrate high sensitivity with adequate specificity. The Julayanont combination approach had unacceptable sensitivity in this sample. These findings suggest MoCA cutoffs are poor predictors of future cognitive progression in those with aMCI and highlight the importance of comprehensive longitudinal follow-up.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.275
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B - 114 Evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score for Predicting Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Clinical Syndrome Progression

Anthony J Longoria, Oscar Kronenberger, Jeff Schaffert, Trung Nguyen et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

B - 114 Evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score for Predicting Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Clinical Syndrome Progression

Anthony J Longoria, Oscar Kronenberger, Jeff Schaffert, Trung Nguyen, Alyssa N Kaser, Laura H. Lacritz, Diamond Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) is derived from the MoCA as a supplementary memory measure, with research suggesting the MoCA-MIS can identify those at higher risk of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s Clinical Syndrome (ACS). This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA total score (TS), delayed free recall score (DFRS), and MIS in classifying amnestic MCI (aMCI) to ACS converters and replicated an algorithm recommended by Julayanont et al. (2014). Methods National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center data were examined in individuals with aMCI, ≥50 years of age (Myears = 75.35[7.92]) who had 3–6 annual follow-up visits. Participants (n = 353) were mostly male (58%), White (88%), and well-educated (Myears = 16.37[5.21]). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses utilized baseline MoCA scores to examine optimal cutoffs using Youden’s index. Sensitivity and specificity of Julayanont’s algorithm (TScutoff<20 + MIScutoff<7) were also examined. Results Over follow-up (Myears = 4.52[1.02]), 53.3% converted to ACS. ROC analyses to predict longitudinal conversion from aMCI to ACS revealed similar sensitivity and specificity across MoCA scores (TScutoff<24, AUC = 0.67, Sensitivity = 0.78, Specificity = 0.49; DFRScutoff<2, AUC = 0.67, Sensitivity = 0.75, Specificity = 0.54; MIScutoff<8, AUC = 0.69, Sensitivity = 0.66, Specificity = 0.64). The Julayanont algorithm displayed low sensitivity (0.18) but high specificity (0.93) in this sample. Conclusion In predicting aMCI to ACS conversion over a 3–6 year period, baseline MoCA-TS, DFRS, and MIS cutoffs failed to demonstrate high sensitivity with adequate specificity. The Julayanont combination approach had unacceptable sensitivity in this sample. These findings suggest MoCA cutoffs are poor predictors of future cognitive progression in those with aMCI and highlight the importance of comprehensive longitudinal follow-up.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.