A - 83 Concordance between Informant Measures, Executive Functioning, and Functional Ability in an Older Adult Population

Abstract Objective Informant-report measures often do not correlate with neuropsychological tests measuring the same cognitive construct, yet they may offer insight into everyday difficulties not captured by objective tests. Performance-based measures of functional ability, developed to capture real-world skills, may better align with informant-report measures. Clarifying the relationship between subjective and objective assessment tools in older adults could enhance precision in selecting the most appropriate measures. Method As part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, community-dwelling older adults who were cognitively unimpaired or who presented with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment completed tests of executive functioning (EF), (D-KEFS Trail Making Test 4, Letter Fluency, WCST, WAIS-Comprehension) and financial capacity, Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Informants responded to measures of functional ability, Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire Short Version (A-IADL-Q-SV) and Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview (AFCI) and items capturing EF on the Brief Informant Form of Neurobehavioral Symptomatology (BINS). Results Participants’ (N = 97, Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 years; Meducation = 15.76 ± 2.42 years; 74.2% female) FCI-SF performance significantly correlated with higher A-IADL-Q-SV (r = 0.403, p < 0.01) and AFCI (r = −0.294, p < 0.01) scores, whereas there was no significant correlation between a composite Z-score for traditional neuropsychological tests and select EF items from the BINS, (r = −0.119, p = 0.252). Conclusion We found greater alignment between objective and subjective measures of functional ability than EF, possibly due to the observable nature of functional tasks. Objective and informant measures of EF do not align, potentially targeting different aspects of cognition in non-demented older adults. This should be considered when selecting instruments measuring specific constructs of interest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.097
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 83 Concordance between Informant Measures, Executive Functioning, and Functional Ability in an Older Adult Population

David E. Warren, Aneela Rahman, Nadia Paré, Anjali Krishnan et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Health and Well-being Studies
article

A - 83 Concordance between Informant Measures, Executive Functioning, and Functional Ability in an Older Adult Population

David E. Warren, Aneela Rahman, Nadia Paré, Anjali Krishnan, Nicole Sergeyev, Hannah S Bodek, Laura A. Rabin, Anna F Wilhelm
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Informant-report measures often do not correlate with neuropsychological tests measuring the same cognitive construct, yet they may offer insight into everyday difficulties not captured by objective tests. Performance-based measures of functional ability, developed to capture real-world skills, may better align with informant-report measures. Clarifying the relationship between subjective and objective assessment tools in older adults could enhance precision in selecting the most appropriate measures. Method As part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, community-dwelling older adults who were cognitively unimpaired or who presented with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment completed tests of executive functioning (EF), (D-KEFS Trail Making Test 4, Letter Fluency, WCST, WAIS-Comprehension) and financial capacity, Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Informants responded to measures of functional ability, Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire Short Version (A-IADL-Q-SV) and Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview (AFCI) and items capturing EF on the Brief Informant Form of Neurobehavioral Symptomatology (BINS). Results Participants’ (N = 97, Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 years; Meducation = 15.76 ± 2.42 years; 74.2% female) FCI-SF performance significantly correlated with higher A-IADL-Q-SV (r = 0.403, p < 0.01) and AFCI (r = −0.294, p < 0.01) scores, whereas there was no significant correlation between a composite Z-score for traditional neuropsychological tests and select EF items from the BINS, (r = −0.119, p = 0.252). Conclusion We found greater alignment between objective and subjective measures of functional ability than EF, possibly due to the observable nature of functional tasks. Objective and informant measures of EF do not align, potentially targeting different aspects of cognition in non-demented older adults. This should be considered when selecting instruments measuring specific constructs of interest.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.