A - 16 A Proof-of-Concept for the Construct Validity of Cognitive Dispersion: Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Dispersion and Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite Scores

Abstract Objective To examine the construct validity of cognitive dispersion (CD) by examining its relationship with the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC) scores across multiple visits among cognitively healthy individuals with hypertension and memory concerns/significant family history of dementia. Methods 435 participants (Mage = 68.90, Meducation = 16.29 years) from the rrAD study with neurocognitive data from five visits over 24 months were included. PACC total scores were derived as per literature from the MMSE, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Logical Memory delayed recall. Raw scores were converted to z-scores using the baseline sample mean and standard deviation (SD) and calculating the mean of these z-scores to form the PACC score. CD was calculated as the intraindividual SD of the z-scores of all tests within the PACC battery. Linear regression, with time representing the five time points as a predictor, examined the relationship between cognitive dispersion and PACC scores. Results The model significantly predicted PACC scores (F[2, 2278] = 65.83, p < 0.001, R^2 = 0.05). Time alone did not significantly predict PACC scores (p = 0.41), but CD was a significant predictor when controlling for time (b = −0.51, SE = 0.04, t = −11.47, p < 0.001), such that greater CD was related to lower PACC composite scores. Conclusion The findings suggest an inverse relationship between CD and PACC scores over time, supporting CD as a potential marker of preclinical cognitive change in this sample. Future research may explore how lifestyle interventions influence this relationship while considering demographic factors such as age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.030
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 16 A Proof-of-Concept for the Construct Validity of Cognitive Dispersion: Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Dispersion and Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite Scores

Jeff Schaffert, Hudaisa Fatima, Heidi Rossetti, C. Munro Cullum et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

A - 16 A Proof-of-Concept for the Construct Validity of Cognitive Dispersion: Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Dispersion and Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite Scores

Jeff Schaffert, Hudaisa Fatima, Heidi Rossetti, C. Munro Cullum, Vishal J Thakkar, Laura H. Lacritz, Rong Zhang, Carly N Burger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine the construct validity of cognitive dispersion (CD) by examining its relationship with the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC) scores across multiple visits among cognitively healthy individuals with hypertension and memory concerns/significant family history of dementia. Methods 435 participants (Mage = 68.90, Meducation = 16.29 years) from the rrAD study with neurocognitive data from five visits over 24 months were included. PACC total scores were derived as per literature from the MMSE, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Logical Memory delayed recall. Raw scores were converted to z-scores using the baseline sample mean and standard deviation (SD) and calculating the mean of these z-scores to form the PACC score. CD was calculated as the intraindividual SD of the z-scores of all tests within the PACC battery. Linear regression, with time representing the five time points as a predictor, examined the relationship between cognitive dispersion and PACC scores. Results The model significantly predicted PACC scores (F[2, 2278] = 65.83, p < 0.001, R^2 = 0.05). Time alone did not significantly predict PACC scores (p = 0.41), but CD was a significant predictor when controlling for time (b = −0.51, SE = 0.04, t = −11.47, p < 0.001), such that greater CD was related to lower PACC composite scores. Conclusion The findings suggest an inverse relationship between CD and PACC scores over time, supporting CD as a potential marker of preclinical cognitive change in this sample. Future research may explore how lifestyle interventions influence this relationship while considering demographic factors such as age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.