B - 130 Application of Item Response Theory to the MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale-19 (RBS-19)

Abstract Objective RBS is a cognitive overreporting scale on the MMPI-family of instruments. Recent efforts to refine the scale removed nine items lacking conceptual and empirical relationships to cognitive dysfunction (Ingram et al., 2024; Ratcliffe et al., 2022). This revised scale version (RBS-19) demonstrated improved utility and classification accuracy, although the improvements were small. Albertorio et al (2024) found that the RBS could be reduced to 14 items and identified potential “critical items”. This study uses IRT in a database of Active-Duty personnel to explore reduced item RBS forms. Method Using a 2-parameter IRT model, we examined cognitive overreporting across the 19-item MMPI-2-RF RBS-19 Scale. Participants (n = 326; 96% male) were divided into pass-all vs fail 2+ standalone PVTs for criterion-based comparisons (e.g., ROC analysis and mean difference), with indetermined profiles removed. Results Results indicate good theta coverage. Two items (24 and 26) were removed due to low α (2). RBS-14/17/19 all had similar AUC (0.72 vs 0.71 vs 0.72) and similar effect sizes between groups. Conclusions IRT analyses supported a 17-item RBS scale rather than the 14 or 19 item versions in this sample. However, no “critical items” emerged in this sample. Such differences may reflect changes in factor structure based on referral reason (Boress et al., 2023).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.291
Primary Topic
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B - 130 Application of Item Response Theory to the MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale-19 (RBS-19)

Tristan T Herring, Paul B. Ingram, Luke Childers, Arianna D. Albertorio
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
article

B - 130 Application of Item Response Theory to the MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale-19 (RBS-19)

Tristan T Herring, Paul B. Ingram, Luke Childers, Arianna D. Albertorio
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective RBS is a cognitive overreporting scale on the MMPI-family of instruments. Recent efforts to refine the scale removed nine items lacking conceptual and empirical relationships to cognitive dysfunction (Ingram et al., 2024; Ratcliffe et al., 2022). This revised scale version (RBS-19) demonstrated improved utility and classification accuracy, although the improvements were small. Albertorio et al (2024) found that the RBS could be reduced to 14 items and identified potential “critical items”. This study uses IRT in a database of Active-Duty personnel to explore reduced item RBS forms. Method Using a 2-parameter IRT model, we examined cognitive overreporting across the 19-item MMPI-2-RF RBS-19 Scale. Participants (n = 326; 96% male) were divided into pass-all vs fail 2+ standalone PVTs for criterion-based comparisons (e.g., ROC analysis and mean difference), with indetermined profiles removed. Results Results indicate good theta coverage. Two items (24 and 26) were removed due to low α (2). RBS-14/17/19 all had similar AUC (0.72 vs 0.71 vs 0.72) and similar effect sizes between groups. Conclusions IRT analyses supported a 17-item RBS scale rather than the 14 or 19 item versions in this sample. However, no “critical items” emerged in this sample. Such differences may reflect changes in factor structure based on referral reason (Boress et al., 2023).

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.