B - 44 Examining Test–Retest Reliability and Mean Score Differences in Self-Reported Neuropsychological Symptoms in Active-Duty and Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (Mtbi)

Abstract Objective Test–retest reliability is a foundational psychometric property of tests, providing a means through which tests may be assessed for time invariant interpretation. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability of several self-report instruments commonly employed in a veteran/military neurocognitive rehabilitation setting. Method Repeat administration of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Key Behaviors Change Inventory (KBCI), Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR12), C4 Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, Post-traumatic Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5), and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was collected across baseline, one, four, and twelve week timepoints. Interclass correlation coefficients and a two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted on 31 Veteran and 22 Active-duty participants (71.5% male). Results Most measures demonstrated a significant mean difference during follow-up, with reductions across the 1- and 4-week follow-ups. ICC ranged from good to excellent (0.76–0.93) across the measures. Correlations between time points on measures were high (e.g., PCL-5 Baseline/4wk r = 0.93), suggesting high reliability for measures despite changing scores after treatment completion. Conclusions This study found good test–retest reliability across the three follow-up timelines, supporting the use of the included measures in neurocognitive rehabilitation settings. Reliability and post-treatment changes in symptoms observed across these measures will be further discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.205
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B - 44 Examining Test–Retest Reliability and Mean Score Differences in Self-Reported Neuropsychological Symptoms in Active-Duty and Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (Mtbi)

Amy O. Bowles, Patrick Armistead‐Jehle, Tristan T Herring, Paul B. Ingram et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

B - 44 Examining Test–Retest Reliability and Mean Score Differences in Self-Reported Neuropsychological Symptoms in Active-Duty and Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (Mtbi)

Amy O. Bowles, Patrick Armistead‐Jehle, Tristan T Herring, Paul B. Ingram, Lyn S. Turkstra, Robert D. Shura, Douglas B. Cooper, Arianna D Albertorio, Glenn Curtiss, Blessen C. Eapen, Lisa O Lu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Test–retest reliability is a foundational psychometric property of tests, providing a means through which tests may be assessed for time invariant interpretation. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability of several self-report instruments commonly employed in a veteran/military neurocognitive rehabilitation setting. Method Repeat administration of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Key Behaviors Change Inventory (KBCI), Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR12), C4 Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, Post-traumatic Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5), and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was collected across baseline, one, four, and twelve week timepoints. Interclass correlation coefficients and a two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted on 31 Veteran and 22 Active-duty participants (71.5% male). Results Most measures demonstrated a significant mean difference during follow-up, with reductions across the 1- and 4-week follow-ups. ICC ranged from good to excellent (0.76–0.93) across the measures. Correlations between time points on measures were high (e.g., PCL-5 Baseline/4wk r = 0.93), suggesting high reliability for measures despite changing scores after treatment completion. Conclusions This study found good test–retest reliability across the three follow-up timelines, supporting the use of the included measures in neurocognitive rehabilitation settings. Reliability and post-treatment changes in symptoms observed across these measures will be further discussed.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.