B - 64 Exploring the Role of Education in Predicting Older Veterans’ Functional Performance on the Pillbox Test

Abstract Objective Previous research demonstrates older adults with less education are at higher risk of medication nonadherence (Jin et al. 2016). The Pillbox Test is a process-oriented, performance-based measurement of executive functioning designed and validated by Zartman and colleagues (2013) which may help identify individuals at risk of medication nonadherence and functional impairment. This study aimed to assess the impact educational attainment has on Pillbox Test performance. Method Participants (n = 208) included a mixed diagnostic sample of older adults who completed the Pillbox Test as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation within a neuropsychology clinic between 2019–2024 (Mage = 71.54, Meducation = 13, 62.5% Caucasian, 89.9% male). Correlational and regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between education and Pillbox Test performance. Results Pearson correlations revealed a significant negative correlation between years of education and Pillbox Test total errors, r(206) = −0.14, p < 0.05, such that lower education was associated with greater errors. However, linear multiple regression analyses revealed education did not uniquely predict errors on the Pillbox Test when accounting for demographic variables (race, education, age, gender). Race was the only significant predictor of Pillbox errors. Specifically, identification as Hispanic (β = 0.21, p < 0.01) or African American (β = 0.18, p < 0.05) predicted greater errors. Conclusion(s) While lower education is associated with poorer Pillbox Test performance, it does not uniquely predict performance when accounting for other demographic variables. That said, the Pillbox Test appears to be a robust measure of functional ability and executive functioning among older adults with diverse educational backgrounds and may be less susceptible to the influence of formal education than other similar measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.225
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B - 64 Exploring the Role of Education in Predicting Older Veterans’ Functional Performance on the Pillbox Test

Taylor McDonald, Andrea L. Zartman, Katie L Granier, Carly Burger
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

B - 64 Exploring the Role of Education in Predicting Older Veterans’ Functional Performance on the Pillbox Test

Taylor McDonald, Andrea L. Zartman, Katie L Granier, Carly Burger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Previous research demonstrates older adults with less education are at higher risk of medication nonadherence (Jin et al. 2016). The Pillbox Test is a process-oriented, performance-based measurement of executive functioning designed and validated by Zartman and colleagues (2013) which may help identify individuals at risk of medication nonadherence and functional impairment. This study aimed to assess the impact educational attainment has on Pillbox Test performance. Method Participants (n = 208) included a mixed diagnostic sample of older adults who completed the Pillbox Test as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation within a neuropsychology clinic between 2019–2024 (Mage = 71.54, Meducation = 13, 62.5% Caucasian, 89.9% male). Correlational and regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between education and Pillbox Test performance. Results Pearson correlations revealed a significant negative correlation between years of education and Pillbox Test total errors, r(206) = −0.14, p < 0.05, such that lower education was associated with greater errors. However, linear multiple regression analyses revealed education did not uniquely predict errors on the Pillbox Test when accounting for demographic variables (race, education, age, gender). Race was the only significant predictor of Pillbox errors. Specifically, identification as Hispanic (β = 0.21, p < 0.01) or African American (β = 0.18, p < 0.05) predicted greater errors. Conclusion(s) While lower education is associated with poorer Pillbox Test performance, it does not uniquely predict performance when accounting for other demographic variables. That said, the Pillbox Test appears to be a robust measure of functional ability and executive functioning among older adults with diverse educational backgrounds and may be less susceptible to the influence of formal education than other similar measures.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

B - 64 Exploring the Role of Education in Predicting Older Veterans’ Functional Performance on the Pillbox Test — Taylor McDonald, Andrea L. Zartman, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS